Please Review My Web Hosting Site

Discussion in 'Reviews' started by kunnusingh, Sep 9, 2009.

0
  1. #1
    Please Review My Web Hosting Site: Dewlance.com


    Please Review on:

    • About Design?
    • You Like my site?
    • What i need to improve in my site?
    • Hover Image is good for my website ?
    • My all Plans Price,Description is need to improve? why ?
     
    kunnusingh, Sep 9, 2009 IP
  2. anis

    anis Peon

    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    Hi, the site is a great idea. There are a few changes I recommend. If I open your site it looks mixed up. It entails that you use proper space between lines and do not use bold font or else change the font to soem leaner signature so that it is easier to read. Ofcourse, please give a non-white background color to your site. Incorporate these changes and then see the difference for yourself!!
     
    anis, Sep 9, 2009 IP
  3. Wajahat

    Wajahat Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    220
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    108
    #3
    my honest review
    1.ur design is not too much impressive, needs improvement
    2.its a good site not bad
    3.u need to improve ur layout...layout gives 1st imp.it should be good
    4. Hover image is good
    5. rest is fine
    best of luck
     
    Wajahat, Sep 9, 2009 IP
  4. kunnusingh

    kunnusingh Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    656
    Likes Received:
    19
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    145
    #4
    anis & Wajahat

    thanks for good review: SeaGreen, ok i am change my all bold font and mixed colours and also fix mixed up
    but i can't change "white background color" because if i am change my background colour then all images look like a ugly image :(

    anis ok i am improve my layout and also i am add hover images.
     
    kunnusingh, Sep 9, 2009 IP
  5. khena25

    khena25 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    330
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    103
    #5
    The logo is not attractive! Other than that, it's not that bad
     
    khena25, Sep 9, 2009 IP
  6. llxll_shaheen_llxll

    llxll_shaheen_llxll Peon

    Messages:
    69
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    Hi, I tend to agree with these guys. You need to change your font to simple (remove bold) and create emphasis through color. A bit of cluttering needs looking into, which I think is because of disproportionate font size and line spacing. Best of luck!
     
    llxll_shaheen_llxll, Sep 9, 2009 IP
  7. netdriver788

    netdriver788 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,343
    Likes Received:
    74
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    158
    #7
    The template and layout is not attractive and should leave spaces between contents since it is mixed up now.Change the link color in footer since it is not visible now.
     
    netdriver788, Sep 11, 2009 IP
  8. seoboot

    seoboot Guest

    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    Just review the other sites which are offering the similar kinda content.Your front page seems very rushy and everything seems a bit hotchpotch. Please rearrange the content neatly.
     
    seoboot, Sep 11, 2009 IP
  9. boomer12

    boomer12 Peon

    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    He is banned now. So for sure cannot see it
     
    boomer12, Sep 11, 2009 IP
  10. ssaerocoupe

    ssaerocoupe Peon

    Messages:
    59
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #10
    :confused:
    The layout is fine but you do need some help with colors and font. Try using a more professional looking font and use contrasting colors not colors that meld together and get lost in each other. It did load fine, however and with some work in the aforementioned areas would be a very nice site indeed..
     
    ssaerocoupe, Sep 11, 2009 IP