Please review my logo.

Hi,

I just bought the domain name PageRankster.com, and I will make a collection of good SEO tools (maybe make my own, like pagerank lookup, future pagerank, meta tag generator etc.), and some good articles about SEO.

I have made a logo to the site, and just want to hear what you think about it.

Here it is:


Hope you like it ;-)

Maybe you could also give me ideas to good SEO tools that can be made/added to the site (it's not up yet).

Thanks!

 

I like the short logo because it's somewhat iconic and I also prefer the gradient version of the longer logo.

I think you can use both (short and long) for branding your site.

 

Your logos look great -

I just tagged this site the other day, maybe you could use these tools

http://www.webfinderpro.co.uk/seo-tools-tips-resources.html#keywordtools

 

I think all are good, choose which one goes best with website

 

first one is the best according to my choice
thanks

 

They are all good, I have a little preference for the reflected logo, however it all depends on the rest of your websites design and feel.

 

I like the reflected logo best but with more txt effect

 

reflected logo looks very good.

 

Thanks, nice that you like it!

@sheilasultani: Thanks for the link ;-) I'll check it out.

 

I love the short logo and prefer the reflected logo out of the other long ones.
Very nice.

 

BTW. Anyone got an idea for a slogan for the page?

 

The logos look good I like the reflected logo the best.

 

Hey, i like the 1st the most. Looks nice, not too plain.
What do you use to make it?

 

Thanks,

@ject: I'm using Photoshop CS3.

I'm duplicating my text layer, rasterizing it, flip it vertical and taking the rect. marquee tool with a feather of 14-20 and deleting the bottom of the text, then I add a lens blur (gauss. can also be used).
Finally, you can set the opacity to 50% or something that fits your image.

 

I'm so very new to photoshop. Using an older version. Currently more to editing photos.. (rookie )

 

The short and reflected ones are good.

 

Here's another take on the question, since for the short form logo, you used PR, presumably standing for [P]age[R]ankster, how about changing the orange to the [R]ankster instead? That will also break up your word and make it easier to read and remember, connecting the pronunciation of the word with the visual clue of the orange. Here's a quick mock up.

Hope it helps!

 

The reflection is repetitive, the colour scheme is repetitive, get something unique and creative.

 

i like the first 2

 

The short logo looks the most attractive to me. Simple, elegant and professional. The longer ones seem a bit... Plain...