plane crashes into side of Texas office building

you still don't get it do you? My criticism was never about the article which new selected text from, it's always been about the intentions of new. Which, as they always are, was to lessen the crimes of his brothers by comparing them to crimes of non-muslims. I can only assume you are deliberately failing to grasp this simple concept.

 

http://ofgoatsandmen.blogspot.com/2010/02/joseph-andrew-stack-had-911-nsa-cia-and.html

Joseph Andrew Stack Had 9/11, NSA, and Homeland Security Related Defense Contractor Clients
The client list from the software programmer believed to have crashed his plane into the Echelon* building in Austin Texas reads like a guidebook to defense contractors with connections to 9/11, NSA and Homeland Security.

The FBI had his webpage removed (the screen message previously said that the FBI had it removed) from the internet, but of course the client list from the webpage has been archived. As first discovered by Cryptogon, the client list has corporations on it such as Interstate Electronics Corporation, which needed Mr. Stack's help on developing a GPS-based Fight Management System of all things. IEC is a wholly owned subsidiary of L-3 which is a defence contractor with obvious Homeland Security and NSA connections. There is also this report from Wayne Madsen on Oped News of an L-3 consultant to the NSA who had watched a live feed of the first 9/11 plane impact as it happened. L-3 is included among corporations which were investigated by the SEC for unusual stock put-options in relation to 9/11.
Cylink Corporation, another on Mr. Stack's client list had as it's Chief Executive Officer, William P. Crowell who "came to Cylink from the National Security Agency, where he held a series of senior positions, including Deputy Director of Operations and the Deputy Director of the Agency. From 1989 to 1990, Crowell served as a vice president at Atlantic Aerospace Electronics Corporation, now a subsidiary of Titan Systems, leading business development in space technology, signal processing and intelligence systems."
Hughes Aircraft, one of Stack's clients, developed the ground mission control segment of the Global Hawk. Another Stack client, Teledyne, is the prime contractor for the Global Hawk, and L3 supplied its communications system.
Other clients on the list such as DMC Stratex Networks and Sorrento Electronics also are defense contractors and probably a closer examination of these and other corporations on Stack's client list will reveal more interesting details.

*Note: the name echelon itself refers to a "signals intelligence (SIGINT) collection and analysis network" coordinated by the NSA.

 

I agree, the 'C' word(communism) changed with 'T' Word(Terrorism) and consequently was held responsible for anything and everything evil in the world, After-all you do need an enemy to keep the War Inc. running.

@Stox
The article does not try to 'lessen' any crimes, it is merely showing you a mirror, exposing the hypocrisy of West when it comes to 'terrorism'

 

That's what I said. I specifically said the article doesnt do that. What I said is that you do.

 

How did new do that in this thread, when there is not a single word by him in that post and it is only a direct copy and paste from the article?
In previous post you mentioned that you knew that author's motive and now you claim that you know new's motive, is your power of reading people's mind limited to those 2 or can you read everyone's mind? Which God gave you this magical power?

 

The religious (especially muslims) are as predictable as no mark hacks are. No gift is required to understand eithers motives, you only need a functioning brain.

 

are you trying to defend terrorism new?

 

Why not ask this from Glenn Greenwald ?
I only posted his article ? do you disagree with the opinion of the article ?
if yes, than how do you think that it is wrong ?

 

your action of posting this thread is at question, is the purpose to defend terrorism?

 

you action of posting this question is at question, is the purpose to defend the manipulation of word 'terrorism' ?

 

the purpose is to find out if your are defending terrorism

 

are you finding the Motorola's Superbowl commercial with Megan fox sexy?

this question is as much related to this thread as the question if I am defending terrorism! out of an article written by Glenn, in which he has shared HIS opinion that how is word terrorism manipulated to suit needs of Govt and Media

 

He was christian so irs fucked up with his mind..what would have been the case if he was a muslim?

I guess FBI would have found out that he used to pray 50 times a day...used to email someone whose neighbour is from iraq ...whose brother works in a company and and one of his brother colleague used to attend prayers in a mosque whose Imam was from a village in yemen ..which is under control of Al-Qaida. another terrorist plot unveiled.

someone would have found some of his posts or mails starting with praise of allah.. a muslim extremist..

 

And your point?

Because this man did a terrifying act you are then comparing him to a muslim extremist.

The difference is that MR. Joseph Stack did not committ the act because of his religion, he did it because the terrorist (IRS) made him feel as if he had nothing left and messed-up with his mind.

Unlike the terrorist of what we know does always points to his religion and guess what that religion is,...I bet you, you will never guess who likes to blow things up to bits over and over again.