I just finished talking to an Adwords rep about this - I reported my company's competitor for creating multiple "copies" of their site for the sole reason of appearing more than 6 times on a SERP for a keyword term. The competitor was doing it for their own company name, which gets a huge amount of searches per day. So, they not only had the top 3 "yellowbox" ad positions as well as SERP position #1 right under it, but also two or three more on the upper right hand side, one on the lower right, and several on page 2 (if you click "see more sponsors" or whatever it says). They're doing this for many keywords - some of which are very competitive and important to the industry we're in. Anyway, after I reported this for a 2nd time in over 3 weeks (since nothing was done after my first letter), the Google rep said that it's possible that the policy specialist team deemed them to not be "completely identical sites", even though the URLs are all the same, except with dashes in different positions, and different extensions like .com and .info. All of these sites are even using the same graphics template, with the headings & keyword saturation slightly adjusted. In closing, if you want to appear all over page 1 of a search result on the Adwords spots, you can simply make a bunch of optimized mini-sites just for Adwords. Sounds absolutely ridiculous, unprofessional and purpose-defeating to me for Google users but I guess it's all about the money with Google...
mate, i think the reason making to you such a trouble , isnt making for google any troubles good luck
For all Google's disingenuous bleating about quality of sites etc..... as long as it sees the money rolling in it's fine. Don't worry though - they will lose out soon enough - swings and roundabouts and all that. Google is a money making enterprise... it doesn't 'care' in any sense of the word that you or i understand.. any more than EXXON care or Virgin 'care'. Google is actually a serious threat to freedom - it monopolises the net and disenfranchises anyone who disagrees. The site at the top of a search in any business will be the sites who can afford serious SEO.. is that any kind of 'free search' for the consumer?