PentiumII with Windows98 - faster than Amd64 3200+ WinXp

Discussion in 'General Chat' started by latehorn, Feb 13, 2006.

  1. AWD1

    AWD1 Peon

    Messages:
    191
    Likes Received:
    12
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #21
    Then why do you have to format 3 times every year? If it's working, it shouldn't ever need to be formatted at all.
     
    AWD1, Feb 14, 2006 IP
  2. Greg-J

    Greg-J I humbly return to you.

    Messages:
    1,844
    Likes Received:
    153
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    135
    #22
    I'd be interested to know where he gets his information from, and exactly what he means by 'performance drops over time'. I owned a small boutique PC maker for 3 years before I sold it, and I can see no facts or figures that would allow him to come to such a conclusion. As for the old AMD vs. Intel; They're not equal. Not at all. I'm not saying one is better than the other, but I have my preference.
     
    Greg-J, Feb 14, 2006 IP
  3. AWD1

    AWD1 Peon

    Messages:
    191
    Likes Received:
    12
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #23
    It's all about the VIA C3 Ezra chip anyway...right, Greg-J? :)
     
    AWD1, Feb 14, 2006 IP
  4. nevetS

    nevetS Evolving Dragon

    Messages:
    2,544
    Likes Received:
    211
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    135
    #24
    I'll take them both on with a 486 DX2/66 running Linux and Lynx :)
     
    nevetS, Feb 14, 2006 IP
  5. Basoone

    Basoone Peon

    Messages:
    544
    Likes Received:
    18
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #25
    Well base on my exoerience using AMD and Pentium processors the only difference is that AMD's temperature is quite higher than Pentium but I think it will depends on what Processor Fan and Heat sink you are using.

    Maybe its because of XP's firewall that websites loads slower than using Win98:)
     
    Basoone, Feb 14, 2006 IP
  6. latehorn

    latehorn Guest

    Messages:
    4,676
    Likes Received:
    238
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #26
    I reformat the new one every month.
     
    latehorn, Feb 14, 2006 IP
  7. Greg-J

    Greg-J I humbly return to you.

    Messages:
    1,844
    Likes Received:
    153
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    135
    #27
    classic ;)
     
    Greg-J, Feb 14, 2006 IP
  8. _vlada_

    _vlada_ Peon

    Messages:
    743
    Likes Received:
    57
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #28
    I have two OS on same computer. 98 and xp.

    98 is so much faster, and that is why I never deinstalled him. Every single software runs instantly. Iam talkink about same versions of programs installed on both systems. Browsing through internet is about 5x faster in 98. Multitasking flying. I dont know why but OS ruining quality of hardware since windows 95.

    When you install windows 98 he is about 200mb on hd. Can completely enter my ram. I love windows 98.
     
    _vlada_, Feb 14, 2006 IP
  9. latehorn

    latehorn Guest

    Messages:
    4,676
    Likes Received:
    238
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #29
    ^^ Yeah, exactly.. XP is bit more stable, but as soon as you remove the ethernet cable, XP is useless because 98 is instantly.
     
    latehorn, Feb 14, 2006 IP
  10. Greg-J

    Greg-J I humbly return to you.

    Messages:
    1,844
    Likes Received:
    153
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    135
    #30
    Perhaps I have forgotten just how 'fast' 98 truly is. But I wouldn't be willing to go back to it to find out.
     
    Greg-J, Feb 14, 2006 IP
  11. SumitBahl

    SumitBahl Reign of Chaos

    Messages:
    5,170
    Likes Received:
    596
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #31
    Yes, right, even i am not willing to go back, i agree it was fast, but was unstable for me and you are really forgetting the networking part. And, feel of XP is so much better than 98.

    Actually, i have never used AMD, so i cannot really comment anything on the issue, i just believed what he said. But this comparison i heard was around 1.5 years back, maybe AMD are producing better chips now.
     
    SumitBahl, Feb 14, 2006 IP
  12. Peanut

    Peanut Peon

    Messages:
    479
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #32
    I guess it depends which line of processors you are talking about. I know that the duel core amd vs the duel core pentiums the amd wins hands down on both performance and heat. If i remember correctly a major factor to do with the performace is the memory controller for the amd is intergrated into the chip where as the intel is on the mb.

    edit: yeah just saw this
    http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-10442_7-6389077-1.html?tag=lnav
    amd wins hands down.
     
    Peanut, Feb 15, 2006 IP