Since Google indexes also pdf document, is it worth to spend time to convert all texts into html? With other words, have texts in pdf the same value for Google as html, can keywords inside pdf files rank as well as normall text in html? tnx for answers
Google does faster index pdf format documents then page because it is to be download format. but ranking can increase to mention keywords in open html page because google will not consider the keywords whose given in PDF file.
First, though, I'll note that PDF does have some benefits: * PDF is good when the file is destined for printing, and the precise printed page layout is important, or when there are images which should be rendered at high resolution on the printed page. * PDF is useful for taking fancy newsletters which are designed for the printed page, and making them available online without much hassle. * PDF format is currently useful for math and special symbols, until MathML and better internationalization is widely supported for HTML. Beyond those few cases, HTML is generally much better for providing information via the web. * The aspect ratio (which is usually not 4:3) and size of the pages in a PDF document is a poor match for a computer screen. So reading PDF on-line is generally a worse experience than reading HTML. With good HTML, the user can choose a font size and a window width so the text is easy to read, and the paragraphs are laid out to match the user's preference. But with PDF the user has no choice of line length. At a nice font size the page often doesn't fit on the screen. Reading 2-column output requires either a small font or lots of up-and-down scrolling. Headers and footers and page breaks get in the way. * Your audience is limited with PDF because it doesn't work on all platforms - e.g. handheld browsers. It requires extra software and takes more memory and CPU power, which is a problem for older computers. * PDF information is less accessibile than HTML, e.g. for those with vision impairments. * PDF is designed for printing, not browsing or spreading information. When the user does a copy-and-paste of text, it all ends up in one blob with paragraphs, lists, etc. all mushed together into one unformatted paragraph. Words that contain ligatures (like when "fi" is represented by a single joined printing symbol) will often be garbled. Often the entire selection doesn't show up in the clipboard. Problems with hyphenation and multiple columns, etc. often crop up. * Images are embedded, so they aren't easy to pull out as a .jpg or .gif file for reuse. * Hyperlinks work badly. Relative hyperlinks are generally preferable but don't work on some platforms. Putting it all in one file to avoid this handicap makes it slower and harder to just read one part of the document. * PDF files are usually larger than a simple HTML version. * PDF documents are harder to reuse since they are not an editable source format and the formatting instructions are gone. * Programs that create PDF are less available or cost more money than programs to produce HTML. * PDF "Security" is sometimes viewed by producers as a useful feature, but it is mostly useful "for keeping honest people honest". Anything that someone can view on the screen can be captured for use elsewhere, so it won't protect you from plagarizers, etc. Features like printing or saving to a file can be made more difficult, but simply can't be prevented.