Paying to get listed into DMOZ

Discussion in 'ODP / DMOZ' started by hhhhhhhh, Apr 21, 2011.

  1. snooks

    snooks Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,054
    Likes Received:
    98
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    175
    #21
    Well at least you admit that you cant prove they are real :)

    So commonsense will tell you that as in law, "You are innocent until proven guilty". So you can quit claiming it is "proof" of corruption because as you said yourself, you cant even prove they are real and not scams aimed at people obsessed with their sites being in DMOZ.
     
    snooks, May 7, 2011 IP
  2. RamCity

    RamCity Peon

    Messages:
    732
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #22
    I think this freelancer is the proof of dmoz paid listing. http://www.freelancer.com/users/feedback_2198118.html

    Kindly look, how he did the listing within 10 days.

    Still the dmoz fellows say that it is not paid!! I can't believe. Instead of doing inquiry on the activity of that user/editor, the person is getting slammed by dmoz fellows.

    http://www.picpaste.com/pics/Feedback_for_mightybo_-_Freelancer.com-FBqB5XYH.1304818582.png
     
    Last edited: May 7, 2011
    RamCity, May 7, 2011 IP
  3. RamCity

    RamCity Peon

    Messages:
    732
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #23
    He is from Belgium. Another proof is enough:

    http://www.picpaste.com/pics/mightybo_-_Freelancer.com_-_dmoz_advisor-JqSojnYO.1304818718.png

    Hmm... dmoz editor here. :)

    I can find-> http://www.dmoz.org/search?q=www.dartshop.com.au
    and -> http://www.dmoz.org/search?q=www.ofear.com


    Now I am also sure that my site won't be listed there. I have come to the point about what is going around there.

    I shall stay away from such controvercial free services. :D
     
    Last edited: May 7, 2011
    RamCity, May 7, 2011 IP
  4. snooks

    snooks Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,054
    Likes Received:
    98
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    175
    #24
    Congratulations, you are so observent, considering i display them in my profile. I also mention that i am a DMOZ Editor. :)
    Yes both sites are listed in DMOZ, as both are compliant. Its a shame that the other 10-15 sites i operate are non-compliant as if they complied, i would list them also :)

    Listing your own sites in DMOZ is no issue as long as you declare your affiliations, ensure that the sites meet the guidelines for listability and that you treat it like you would treat any other site.

    Is there anything else you would like to infer?? You wernt hinting i was doing anything wrong, i hope??
     
    snooks, May 7, 2011 IP
  5. DhrubaJyotiDeka

    DhrubaJyotiDeka Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    647
    Likes Received:
    9
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    #25
    I think I haven't asked you anything. I asked Jim, as he only comes up with some genuine answers. I don't have time to look at your crap posts. Kindly avoid my posts, and please do not reply to my posts. You don't have any logic or answer in your posts.


    Corrupt DMOZ Editor's Profile-> http://www.freelancer.com/users/2198118.html

    Now look at ome proofs:

    Completed projects:
    1] http://www.freelancer.com/projects/Internet-Marketing-SEO/DMOZ-Listing-for-Fashion-Website.html
    Project posted: 04/26/2011
    Review posted: 04/05/2011
    Listing done in: 9 days
    Website owner from: laddonia, USA


    2] http://www.freelancer.com/projects/SEO/Guaranteed-Submission-DMOZ.html
    Project posted: 04/14/2011
    Review posted: 04/19/2011
    Listing done in: 5 days
    Website owner from: Provo, USA

    3] http://www.freelancer.com/projects/SEO-Link-Building/Guaranteed-DMOZ-listing.984783.html
    Project posted: 03/15/2011
    Review posted: 03/23/2011
    Listing done in: 8 days
    Website owner from: Boucherville, Canada

    4] http://www.freelancer.com/projects/914430.html
    Project posted: 01/15/2011
    Review posted: 03/16/2011
    Listing done in: 59 days
    Website owner from: San Diego, USA

    5] http://www.freelancer.com/projects/Internet-Marketing-SEO/guaranteed-dmoz-listing.983896.html
    Project posted: 03/14/2011
    Review posted: 03/24/2011
    Listing done in: 10 days
    Website owner from: London, UK

    6] http://www.freelancer.com/projects/Internet-Marketing-SEO/Guaranteed-Dmoz-listing.974393.html
    Project posted: 03/06/2011
    Review posted: 03/13/2011
    Listing done in: 7 days
    Website owner from: wichita, USA

    7] http://www.freelancer.com/projects/962870.html
    Project posted: 02/25/2011
    Review posted: 03/09/2011
    Listing done in: 12 days
    Website owner from: Warszawa, Poland

    8] http://www.freelancer.com/projects/Internet-Marketing-SEO/Urgent-DMOZ-entry-needed.html
    Project posted: 02/23/2011
    Review posted: 03/06/2011
    Listing done in: 11 days
    Website owner from: Pasadena, USA

    9] http://www.freelancer.com/projects/941085.html
    Project posted: 02/08/2011
    Review posted: 03/07/2011
    Listing done in: 27 days
    Website owner from: Edinburgh, UK

    The simple compliment is: The freelancer is not any simple DMOZ Editor as he is listing any in category of any region. Hence he is either Senior Editor or Meta Editor.





    I was shouting for year, why most of the categories are not updated for years. But here I can see updates are being done in even 7 days too.
    Now I have understood why categories are not being updated. Because if categories are regularly updated or updated frequently, there will be no market for DMOZ listing, hence there will be no earning for the DMOZ Editors.

    After all they are volunteering for FREE(!). So, they need some wahges I think. Good, keep going.

    Best of luck to DMOZ. It was my fault that I was expecting the most corrupt directory as non-corrupted. I must blame myself.



    Qryztufre, I think we are wasting our time talking about those crap and corrupts. We should leave this thread as you can see no one is interested here to bother. Let them get more corrupted. Who cares!
     
    Last edited: May 7, 2011
    DhrubaJyotiDeka, May 7, 2011 IP
  6. datrader

    datrader Peon

    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #26
    isn't it funny that dmoz editors have their sites listed in dmos. I like this system of "refer a friend" (or yourself for that matter).

    think i'll apply for editing myself, but whats their interest in accepting new guys? they seem to make loads of money with no work...

    any editor care to explain?
     
    datrader, May 7, 2011 IP
  7. photofox

    photofox Active Member

    Messages:
    61
    Likes Received:
    11
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    50
    #27
    There is nothing wrong with an editor listing a site they are associated with as long as it is suitable for inclusion, given a title and description that follows our editing guidelines and is not treated any differently than other sites in the same category.

    Editors found accepting money in exchange for listing a site are removed along with the sites that paid.

    How can examples like that be considered proof? There is no useful information. There are 1000's of website owners from London. "I might be able to help - see PM." is also not helpful, if you can supply a copy of the PM then perhaps that might offer more useful details...

    Accusations of editorial abuse or corruption are taken very seriously, but you need to supply more than a few vague freelancer posts as proof.
     
    photofox, May 8, 2011 IP
  8. RamCity

    RamCity Peon

    Messages:
    732
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #28
    I have a suggestion if you can take honestly.

    1] Search for the websites added between 03/14/2011 and 03/24/2011. I hope there aren't much as people here are crying 'my site is not listed for 3 years', 'my site is not listed for 2 years' etc etc.

    2] Search for such dmoz editors who has that much power to edit in several categories.

    3] Get the dmoz editor of Belgium.

    If you cannot catch that dmoz editor, then accept that dmoz editors are taking bribes now a days. Simple.

    DhrubaJyotiDeka had to show you the photo of that dmoz editor!
    Or does he had to show you the video footage of that dmoz editor taking bribe!!

    Ask him, he may be able to provide you such proof for your satisfaction. After all, there are something else also needed for satisfaction, beyond of money. :D
     
    RamCity, May 8, 2011 IP
  9. datrader

    datrader Peon

    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #29
    yadayadayada

    if the big bad wolf will catch you...
    come on with these stories. I've applied several times to be an editor of a category i personally involvled with as a hobby, this category didn't have an editor, no reply, no nothin.
    also submitted so many authority sites and none been accepted.
    there's clearly something wrong in DMOZ...
     
    datrader, May 8, 2011 IP
  10. RamCity

    RamCity Peon

    Messages:
    732
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #30
    I agree that dmoz is having something wrong. And in this thread we have seen many proof of these wrongs. :D
     
    RamCity, May 8, 2011 IP
  11. lucyfrances

    lucyfrances Greenhorn

    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    #31
    so far I've tried many times but could not register my site is no dmoz
     
    lucyfrances, May 8, 2011 IP
  12. Bart Simpson

    Bart Simpson Peon

    Messages:
    210
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #32
    I 100% agree with you. :D
     
    Bart Simpson, May 8, 2011 IP
  13. RamCity

    RamCity Peon

    Messages:
    732
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #33
    Here comes the scope of taking bribe for listing in dmoz.
     
    RamCity, May 8, 2011 IP
  14. Bart Simpson

    Bart Simpson Peon

    Messages:
    210
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #34
    Yes this is the time. :D
     
    Bart Simpson, May 8, 2011 IP
  15. RamCity

    RamCity Peon

    Messages:
    732
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #35
    You submit your site, it won't be listed.
    But you pay the Editors in freelancer sites, you will be listed for sure as the above proofs. :D
     
    RamCity, May 8, 2011 IP
  16. gamingmaster42

    gamingmaster42 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    511
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    165
    #36
    Its not worth it. $250 for one link? Thats not including all the risk you are taking.
     
    gamingmaster42, May 8, 2011 IP
  17. RamCity

    RamCity Peon

    Messages:
    732
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #37
    Many people dare to pay more than $250 for a link in dmoz.
     
    RamCity, May 8, 2011 IP
  18. gamingmaster42

    gamingmaster42 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    511
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    165
    #38
    But its not worth it, for $250 i can get myself a lot more value than one dmoz link is worth.
     
    gamingmaster42, May 8, 2011 IP
  19. RamCity

    RamCity Peon

    Messages:
    732
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #39
    That is what I do also prefer.
     
    RamCity, May 8, 2011 IP
  20. Qryztufre

    Qryztufre Prominent Member

    Messages:
    6,071
    Likes Received:
    491
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    300
    #40
    Its really a two way streak is it not? I also can not prove that ALL of the links in the ODP are not paid. Are you saying that because I can not pove that there are no unpaid listings in the ODP that those too don't exist? I did say that I can not prove they are real, but take that for what it is... POSITIVE FEED BACK for COMPLETED TRANSACTIONS from MULTIPLE people for MULTIPLE sites.

    So again, another dmoz supporter slapping the obvious in the face... why? Got something to hide?

    Its certainly evidence of corruption, and evidence has to be worth something, right? What do you have to back up there are no paid listings? Anonymously's posts claiming I'm lying? LOL. You'll have to try a LOT harder then that.

    Now again, WHAT DO YOU WANT AS PROOF?

    I keep asking that, yet no one is willing to give me an answer... and no, I am not going to waste my own hard earned cash just to prove something that's all over every single freelance link building site.
     
    Qryztufre, May 8, 2011 IP