Panda effect "www" ?

Discussion in 'Google' started by hitboy, Nov 27, 2011.

0
  1. #1
    Just out of curiosity did the panda update effect whether sites were using www. infront of their domain or not. whether or not it is still considered two different websites to google or just one?
     
    hitboy, Nov 27, 2011 IP
  2. rajkodirekka

    rajkodirekka Peon

    Messages:
    70
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    What is Pand Effect......Can anyone explain?
     
    rajkodirekka, Nov 27, 2011 IP
  3. WishBone

    WishBone Peon

    Messages:
    2,566
    Likes Received:
    15
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    I don't think Google Panda focus on that part of site, the once and for all simple solution is do a redirect to URL you prefer, with www or without www.
     
    WishBone, Nov 28, 2011 IP
  4. millbey

    millbey Peon

    Messages:
    143
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    The www and non www version will be always on major issues in SEO. And it is considered canonical issue. Without fixing this issue one can not get complete benefit of SEO.
     
    millbey, Nov 28, 2011 IP
  5. Icecube_media

    Icecube_media Peon

    Messages:
    656
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    hi
    yes due to canonical issue your site may seems to be duplicate site , and might hit by panda.
     
    Icecube_media, Nov 28, 2011 IP
  6. hitboy

    hitboy Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,939
    Likes Received:
    69
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    170
    #6
    I just find it stupid that Google would still rate two different sites for content and pr for the "www" issue..
     
    hitboy, Nov 28, 2011 IP
  7. no69_2007

    no69_2007 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,145
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    #7
    panda does not relate to this issue.
     
    no69_2007, Nov 28, 2011 IP