From my post a very good point was made. From your post a very good point was proven. Narcissism is a nasty habit to break you know?
A very reputable german magazine had access to the documents about the deal. Here the address where you can buy the full report
Why the secrecy then when it is for smoke dedectors? Come on, give me a break, - thats a double-standard game. And why have they refused the proposed deal with Europe, where they would have gained more for their country then they do now? Where is a feasibility study about the project? Can the people in Iran really pay for the costs, I mean compared with the prices they pay now for their natural resources and energy? It's really double standard and if nothing is done to prevent this, then we are going to face the cosequences. Iran has a record of hiding terrorists in their country. What credit can you give them for that what they say?
It is hard to be a red neck. Zman and debunk are walking toward each other, and one is carrying a sack. When they meet, Zman says, "Hey debnuk, whatcha got in th' bag?" "Jes' some chickens." "If I guesses how many they is, kin I have one?" "Shoot, if ya guesses right, I'll give you both of 'em!" "OK. Ummmmm...five?"
Can be used for much more than smoke detectors that was just an example, secrecy is easy to see even if they danced around with the contract in the White House to declare them we would have still stated it was for nuclear weapons, nothing more. Maybe they are who knows, but it's very, very shaky weak proof especially for an invasion. Regulations from an outside force for 1 and why should they be pressured to do something by an outside force, if they are complying with current inspections, even though they might not be they are a sovereign nation. Someone could offer me a better car than my chevelle, doesn't mean I'm going to take them up on the offer I might like my Chevelle. Would love to see some country telling the US give up your nukes and we will give you 100% health to every citizen and guaranteed protection. Maybe if this was possible it would be 'better' for the US but I doubt the US is going to accept it. This again proves nothing, and I wouldn't even toss it into the flimsy evidense pile. I've actually read a few and in the long term it would be beneficial to Iran and it's citizens cost wise, environmental wise not to mention the likely hood of down the road they will run out of oil. Double standard? You mean by those against Iran don't you? Yes and so do we. I don't give them much credit truthfully, but there still is no evidence to support a logical theory that it must be nuclear weapons, no other cause.
Buy a report, now that's something I'd put stock into a report that must be bought and is not on any free media outlet at all. Marketing strategy?
How many terrorists are living in Florida? Have you ever looked on how many terrorist organizations in how many countries are sponsored by USA? USA will not even extradite a commercial airline bomber (Posada) who killed 76 people.
Depends on which side you're on of course My son I'm sure would think Santa Clause is a freedom fighter for kids, I myself consider him a terrorist, gets expensive ya know?
Do you consider some one who puts a bomb in a commercial airliner and kills 76 people a freedom fighter? Very interesting definition of freedom fighter, makes me wonder who do you think is a terrorist? Why? Was he refusing to work for CIA any longer?