Ohio Elections Official Calls Machines Flawed

coolmanphp Peon

Messages:: 1,075

Likes Received:: 11

Best Answers:: 0

Trophy Points:: 0

#1

Ohio Elections Official Calls Machines Flawed - New York Times

CINCINNATI â€” All five voting systems used in Ohio, a state whose electoral votes narrowly swung two elections toward President Bush, have critical flaws that could undermine the integrity of the 2008 general election, a report commissioned by the stateâ€™s top elections official has found.
more here

coolmanphp, Dec 16, 2007 IP

Bernard Well-Known Member

Messages:: 1,608

Likes Received:: 107

Best Answers:: 0

Trophy Points:: 185

#2

New York Times said:

At polling stations, teams working on the study were able to pick locks to access memory cards and use hand-held devices to plug false vote counts into machines. At boards of election, they were able to introduce malignant software into servers.

...

The study released Friday found that voting machines and central servers made by Elections Systems and Software; Premier Election Solutions, formerly Diebold; and Hart InterCivic; were easily corrupted.
Click to expand...

Anyone who works with computerized systems knows they can be corrupted if there is sufficient motivation, expertise and resources.

Bernard, Dec 16, 2007 IP

Bernard Well-Known Member

Messages:: 1,608

Likes Received:: 107

Best Answers:: 0

Trophy Points:: 185

#3

Rigged USA Elections Exposed

Bernard, Dec 17, 2007 IP

Bernard Well-Known Member

Messages:: 1,608

Likes Received:: 107

Best Answers:: 0

Trophy Points:: 185

#4

Colorado's secretary of state has declared many of the state's electronic voting machines to be unreliable, but said Tuesday that some of them could still be used in November if a software patch was installed.

...

In his announcement Monday, Coffman said Colorado's actions would have national repercussions. "What we have found is that the federal certification process is inadequate," he said.

The decertification decision, which cited problems with accuracy and security, affects electronic voting machines in Denver and five other counties. A number of electronic scanners used to count ballots were also decertified.

Coffman would not comment Monday on what his findings mean for past elections, despite his conclusion that some equipment had accuracy issues.

"I can only report," he said. "The voters in those respective counties are going to have to interpret" the results.

...

The systems are manufactured by Premier Election Solutions, formerly known as Diebold Election Systems; Hart InterCivic; Sequoia Voting Systems; and Election Systems and Software. Only Premier had all its equipment pass the recertification. ...
Click to expand...

Colorado Voting Machines Tossed Out

Bernard, Dec 19, 2007 IP

Bernard Well-Known Member

Messages:: 1,608

Likes Received:: 107

Best Answers:: 0

Trophy Points:: 185

#5

About 175 computer chips needed to tabulate Feb. 5 election results in San Diego County were lost after they were shipped from Secretary of State Debra Bowen's office after an inspection.

Ohio-based Premier Election Solutions, which manufactures the county's voting machines, said it can replace the chips as early as today. But the loss caused San Diego officials to raise concerns about how careful Bowen is being in the wake of placing severe restrictions on voting machines for the coming election.

...

The county is being forced to use optical-scan machines after Bowen largely banned Premier's touch-screen voting machines in August. Touch screens can only be used for disability access and early voting in future elections. Everyone else must use paper ballots.
Click to expand...

175 chips for voting machines are lost

Ohio's elections chief dashed confidence in the state's election system last week with her revelations that voting machines are vulnerable to manipulation.

...

Brunner said, despite the shocking results, she believes the laser-beam look at controversial electronic voting technology eventually had to be taken. Scientists accessed codes in machines that give the computers instructions, met with experts from the voting machine companies, and questioned election officials with inside knowledge of the system, making it the most comprehensive study in the nation.

"It's better to know, and then you know where you have to go from there, than not to know and keep wandering around in the dark," Brunner said.

She said the feedback she's received since Friday has been overwhelmingly positive, with some people even thanking her for finally looking hard at the technology that has worried many voters for years. ...
Click to expand...

Voting security under scrutiny

Bernard, Dec 20, 2007 IP

Bernard Well-Known Member

Messages:: 1,608

Likes Received:: 107

Best Answers:: 0

Trophy Points:: 185

#6

Coming Jan. 3, 2008: The famous Iowa caucuses. Traditionally considered a critical sign of candidate viability, results in Iowa can make or break candidate funding and public image. What problems can affect caucuses?

Following an Iowa Republican Party straw poll in August, citizens expressed anguish that the votes were counted on Diebold/Premier optical scan voting machines. Another Republican straw poll, in Pinellas County Florida, was afflicted with participants reporting touch-screen voting machines flipping votes from one candidate to another.

In a San Mateo County, Calif. Democratic Party straw poll, votes were counted in public but then accumulated out of public view on a laptop, a procedural flaw that organizers say will be corrected. (It doesn't matter if the initial counting is done in public, if results are summed up in private without releasing the details.)

In Iowa, neither party has been releasing the precinct results that provide the underlying verification for the totals they announce -- a procedure so top-heavy it should come with a laugh track. Black Box Voting and many Iowa citizens have been expressing concern, and urging the release of the data for the 1,900 precincts to back up the announced total.

While it's true that each precinct vote result assigns delegates according to the vote, and those delegates go to a county convention to cast votes (though this is nonbinding), in fact the delegate votes never match the original caucus results, because the county convention is held months after the caucus, and in 2008 will take place after Super Duper Tuesday. Many candidates drop out by the time the convention rolls around, and votes are readjusted.

Caucuses are not subject to freedom of information through public records, because technically the parties are private corporations and do not have to release their documents. Therefore, the caucuses have some built-in impediments to transparency.

Black Box Voting has been raising questions and seeking answers. We've been mailing letters to our Iowa constituents, blogging, and distributing questions and concerns through the voting rights circuitry.

Here's what we've learned so far, revealing some good news and citizen action still needed to prod one of the parties into publicly accounting for its results.

Because caucus procedures for each party differ, will report on them separately.

NO VOTING MACHINES

It's official:

Democratic Party procedures - Haven't and won't use any voting machines in the caucuses.

Republican Party procedures - They used voting machines in the Republican straw poll in August, but will not use the machines in the January caucus.

PUBLIC COUNTING PROCEDURES?

Both parties say they will count the votes in public at the precincts.

Dem procedures: Stand in a clump, count the warm bodies. Public count. Dem procedures are publicly posted on sec. state web site.

Rep Procedures: Write name on piece of paper, hand count it. Rep procedures are not posted yet.

I spoke with Chad Olsen, one of the people with the Iowa Republican Party handling the caucuses. According to Olsen, the procedure will be for each participant to write the name on a piece of paper. Those pieces of paper will be collected and will be counted by the precinct caucus officials in front of representatives for the candidates and an observer or observers.

Devil is in the details on that, chain of custody can go bonkers. It did in the Texas Republican straw poll recently. Still, that's better than voting machines. Done right, it's a public count. Would like to get the procedures, in writing.

RELEASE OF UNDERLYING PRECINCT DATA WHEN ANNOUNCING WINNER?

Dem Party procedures: I have a definite confirm, in writing, from the spokesman for the Iowa Democratic Party that they will release the precinct results. They have never done this before. What they will be doing in 2008 carves out new procedures for improved transparency and citizen oversight. Dem Party spokesman Chris Allen said to watch for a press release, hopefully early next week.

Republican Party procedures: Not yet, opened the door, provided a road map to getting precinct results released promptly on state web site. At this time, however, there are no plans to do so.

Regarding releasing the underlying precinct figures when they announce the winner, Olsen said it might be available by the counties but maybe not right away, maybe a day later.

Iowa has 99 counties, with widely varying ability to handle this on their web sites. I encouraged him to post the results all in one place, and promptly, on the state party web site.

He said the media hasn't had this as a top priority. I explained that the terrain in 2008 is very different than in the caucus period in 2004. There are many different election integrity groups and many citizen oversight groups now, and the needs of citizens doing oversight are not quite the same as those of the media.

I asked him if they had made a decision NOT to post the results. (They never have before). He said they haven't made a decision NOT to. So I asked him if they would consider posting them, even if just as a spreadsheet or simple pdf list of results. He said no one has really asked for it. I said, if people ask for it, might you do it?

He said, if enough people ask for it they might do it.

THIS IS AN IMPORTANT PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARD

When people participate in a caucus, they should be able to see the votes counted in public, and then should be able to promptly go visit a web site to see that the result they observed is the same as the precinct number contained in the total.

For the first time, Democratic Party caucus participants will be able to check that the state total uses their accurate precinct details. Maybe -- if enough people ask for it -- Republican Party caucus participants will be able to have the same transparency.

Methinks enough people should be marshalled to ask for it.
Click to expand...

Black Box Voting: 12-14-07: UPDATE on Iowa Caucus Procedures

You can find the contact information on the Web site for the Republican Party of Iowa - http://www.iowagop.net/

Bernard, Dec 26, 2007 IP

Log in or Sign up

Ohio Elections Official Calls Machines Flawed - New York Times

coolmanphp Peon

Bernard Well-Known Member

Bernard Well-Known Member

Bernard Well-Known Member

Bernard Well-Known Member

Bernard Well-Known Member

Useful Searches