Yeah, this is one of those (why the hell do I get involved in this post) kind of posts. I was bored. Taking a break. Back to work. Hi ho, Hi ho...
Tell you what Mia, send me $1,500.00 a month with a 2 year contract payable up front every month and I will quit my day job and sit on forum and answer posts from 7:00am until 7:00pm every day for you and G-tech. PM me when you are ready for instant responses, it will make forum more exciting for all of us
So it is not important enough for you to tender the contract and first payment Get together with SiteTutor and G-tech, between the 3 of you it can be financed
I'd like to add a point.. just a short one, dont all jump on me and no I'm not anti American in anyway: If the world could vote, neither North Korea OR the US (at the moment) would be high on the list of countries that should have ANY access to Nukes.. Personally, I would give them all to Finland, Norway or another country that seem to have less issues or agendas. And from my experience, I haven't met anyone in the UK that thinks bush is right about anything..but personally, I actually believe HIS contribution is extremely overated.. If we didnt have such bad political opponents to Labour, Blair would already be learning what it feels like to claim Job Seekers Allowance (Im not anti Labour either)
Tony Blair works for the Bank of England just like Bush and Cheney do. Where do you think the oil money is deposited Rounde, not to mention the war money? George only wants another 80 Billion for the next year or so of war, what the hell, it is nothing to us dumb poor Americans and the children who have not been born yet. They also want to strip money from the old folks retirement funds here in the states now in addition to putting all the youth in debt before they are born. You have to love bankers and oil men and their lawyers.
That would be a change. Are you saying you wouldn't dodge questions anymore? Or do what you normally do when someone backs up their position, call it propaganda? BTW, hi Anthony!
Maybe this will be a good thing, no one ever has sympathy for those with money.. being an extremely poor country might sway public opinion. Just kidding! The real question has to be where do most weapons in the world come from.. before you enlighten me anthonycea... i know
It's all extremely grotesque! The American people are being (neo)conned! "Welcome to the USA- we steal from old people and kids!"
Does that mean you can change the topic, Anthony? I warned you about changing the topic and here you are doing it again. Shame, shame, shame! The oil money went to corrupt countries, world leaders, saddam and the United Nations. We have proof of that. But once again, you show your concern for oil, but no outrage to the real oil thieves. Real oil thieves were covered here: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=100443&postcount=44 here: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=99952&postcount=67 Still no outrage over the real oil thieves? Imagine that...
Still flogging the same crap that no one cares about G-tech? Listen man, I already told you that you were wrong, you keep stating that the war is not over oil, but then tell us that the UN is in a food for oil scandal in Iraq, make up your mind man. You can not have it both ways G-tech.
Unfortunately Anthony, you only decide what is right and wrong for those gulible enough to believe what you post. In my case, I find it very beneficial to debate based over facts that can be proven. If I were to take your approach of "you are wrong because I say you are wrong," it wouldn't be much of a debate. The war was not about oil in the manner you project, that Bush and Cheney were/are cheating the world out of oil and getting rich. That's easily disproven. The war was very much about oil in respect to those countries that saddam bought their vote and the UN. There's a difference. I know who the real oil thieves are. You, on the other hand, pretend it's Bush and Cheney with no evidence, and ignore any facts about who the real oil thieves are. Your concern for oil is so sincere Still no outrage for the real oil thieves? I didn't think so.
Your the only guy in the world that does not know anything about the fraud of Halliburton and are blinded by your own bias, you know better, like I mentioned your a propagandist for the Republican party. It is as simple as that.
I expected that. After all, when you cannot dispute the facts, it's much easier to say "propaganda." Heh, not like it's a new pattern or anything. Let me know when you are man enough to debate with facts and back up your positions. I can back mine up, but clearly you cannot. No war for oil!
Real simple, start a thread on it in General Chat and we will hammer it out just for you. Call it "No Oil War", I am sure it will be interesting to discuss.
Ask yourself if there would've been a war even if there was no oil in Iraq. Oil played a major factor in motivating us to invade.
Rob, I disagree. Can you shed any light and/or facts on what supports your position? We're not mining oil there and there are no oil contracts. On the flip side though, a number of our ally's votes were bought with oil, the UN and saddam skimmed BILLIONS in oil money and over 270 influential world leaders (some that could influence votes) were bought off with oil vouchers.