Come on now G-tech, you support Bush even when the first election was a known fraud Gtech, you do not debate facts, you ramble and move on to a new argument when you have no solid ground to stand on. Don't tell the members about me, they already know that I do not back down on any debate nor do I make up details. You just make yourself look bad with such statements and you will find out it will get you no place here with (us, we, the forum) DP members.
I certainly would have liked to have seen a much more impartial body choose our p-elect. I didn't know what to think after the '00 election and the court case.
The first election has long since been disproven as a fraud. There are still some moonbats left that, no matter how much evidence is presented, still cling to it. I think it's cute myself! Even the liberal NY Times published that Bush would have won. To think you are more liberal than the NY Times leaves me with much wonder. Truth be told, I voted for Clinton twice and Bush twice. I'm not a "die hard" republican, but until democrats can shed the left-nut wackos that have taken over their party, that won't change. If kerry is the best they can offer, our country is in serious trouble. You don't even want me to get started on kerry!
You seem to forget who decided the election in 2000 in a state that was controlled by the winners BROTHER, get real Gtech! Votes were stolen, not counted, voters were kept from the polls in Florida in 2000 and 2004. Who won the popular vote in 2000 Gtech?
I covered that in post #69 David: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=100898&postcount=69 I've always taken the notion that if the NY Times would mention it, surely it would set home with those more left centric. I don't think there is any question of the NY Times liberal bias.
Popular votes do not win elections Anthony. Jeb Bush did not steal the election. A comprehensive recount of the votes clearly showed Bush "would have won" anyway. I'm truly sorry if that upsets you, or you cannot deal with that reality, but it is true. Evidence supports, which I've presented. But I've not seen your evidence to refute it. Is the evidence simply your word? We should just all take your word for everything and disregard fact?
Gtech, I told you that the administration would like us to stay on topic within threads here at DP forums. I also told you to start a thead on Bush Election fraud if you keep wanting to discuss it. But you keep coming back in a thread about NK nuclear weapons and discussing issues that we covered in other threads. Are you waiting for a PM from Shawn or what man?
So only you can take things off topic, and when you cannot back up your claims, you presume to "advise me?" Pfft, get a grip on yourself bud! And you keep coming back and changing the topic and going right along with it, UNTIL, you cannot back up your position. Go figure
I think this is the second time I told you in this thread to start a thread on the subject of election fraud in America, but you keep wanting to discuss the last two elections in a thread about NK nuclear weapons. You just seem to have a hard time understanding any message other than the ones you post and that is part of your problem on forum man.. Man the double posting (following your own posts is something that you should also be aware of that upsets the management here), dude get with the program for your own good, OK, I really am trying to help you so you are not regarded as a crazy fanatic....
I'm sure the truth of the elections hurt you deeply, or you would not have participated in them. Perhaps you should practice what you preach.
Gtech, just stay on topic as much as you can OK, and don't double and triple post because you are going to get yourself in trouble and piss off Shawn.
Anthony, you do the same, ok? I'm telling you to stay on topic as much as possible, ok, because I don't want you to get into trouble for doing the same thing I did. That wouldn't be fair to you. </sarcasm off> Thanks for the laughs, and you can have the last word again. I know how important it is.
ok, who was browsing this topic around 6:30 pm? Because I think we have a Neo-Nazi on the boards. I JUST GOT BAD REP FOR THIS^^ A Dp Member Is A Nazi SOMEONE HATES RUSSIANS. god i didn't know we had so many racists on the forums, how sick. whoever you are, you disgust me to the core.
That's pretty sad David. I was arguing the same point, in that it was an allied effort and "all" made the contribution. None for me, but I'm sure that will change after I make this post.
yeah i was saying hitler was stupid for fighting on two fronts when he had an ally in russia to begin with, wasn't there a non-agression pact before the war at some western soviet city...I forget. Anyway, you know what, that nazi can go jump in a lake. I don't normally openly diss ideologies, but Nazism and racist nationalism are some of the stupidist things to believe in.
Isn't this the past? I mean can you get over it? Gore lost, got less votes.. Hmm. Sounds simple. Personally if we want to waste time looking for fraud and lost votes or "stolen votes" there should have been a recount here in WI in 2000 and 2004. The fraud here was rampant. Most of our population resides in Milwaukee, and wow, the corruption there. Yikes. The thing is the corruption in WI went the other way. Cigarettes and Undies for homeless votes. Tire slashing vans that were used to transport Republican voters. There is a long line of foul play that takes place here in the birth place of the GOP. In any event I know I for one am sick and tired of hearing how the 2000 election was "stolen". Think about that for a bit. In order for the election to have been stolen, Gore would have had to have first won the election. This did not happen as a count, recount, and recount of the votes showed time and time again. Move on...