North American Union driver's licenses now being issued!

ok so you're basically saying that I do not have a mental capacity? My comment was based on the mindset of others and now you're commenting my own with the same gesture?

guerilla, yes these are some fascinating double standards i've observed..

 

Take a moment to try to understand the difference between attacking a person and attacking the persons argument.

 

how is saying someone doesn't have the mental capacity not an attack on that person?

 

If you would like to say that about yourself, then so be it.

However, my statement was not aimed at you. You were not mentioned at all in that statement. Or, in fact, in that entire post.

Please, be more careful in your reading.

Let's review.

This is not a "personal attack", because I am not talking about you or referring to you.

 

Nate, it's best to let Will go. He's very proficient at baiting attacks, and then reporting people for bans. There are a couple people in here who do that when their positions cannot hold up to scrutiny.

 

you said that I made a personal attack. then you told me about an attacker. therefore you are implying that i was that "attacker".

even if you weren't, if you stated that what i said was a personal attack your logic contradicts itself.

 

Now, would you gentlemen care to explain how these two statements are not personal attacks?

Moreover, could you please explain how either of these statements challenge anyone's views?

 

I really cannot be held responsible for your choice in self-selecting yourself as a member of a group after reading my post.

That is your decision and your responsibility.

I'm sorry, I am unable to explain this any more clearly.

I have reached the end of my limited communications aptitude.

If you still don't understand, I'm afraid that I am unable to help you to understand.

 

will, i'm not talking about our posts, i'm talking about yours. I'm also doing this from your logic. by your logic, obviously we already make personal attacks but now i'm analyzing your comments by your logic.

but i find it also interesting how as soon as you realized you were technically wrong you changed the course of the question. good job.

 

I can't answer for Nate, but I don't think his view was a personal attack.

I was merely paying you a compliment for the fantastic corporate global foot soldier you are. It's just lovely.

 

Yeah, the limit was a lot closer than you thought, hunh?

 

"If you still don't understand, I'm afraid that I am unable to help you to understand."


that's ashame. it also seems that you can't understand any point other than your own.

 

Will does try hard though Nate. He really does try.

But as he said, in some communications, he has limited aptitude.

We all are what we are.

 

lmfao good point.

 

Funny posts, gentlemen. However, neither of you have:

• Made any real effort at showing that your statements were not personal attacks.
• Made any progress at showing that my posts were personal attacks.

It's good that you two have found soul-mates, but that is hardly a logical victory.

My failure is only in my ability to communicate ideas in simple language.

You gentlemen have failed to communicate ideas at all. You have conveyed only emotion.

 

i think your failure is the inability to understand someone else's point. anyone can sit back and say what they hear doesn't make sense. it's pretty simple really.

 

One again, more emotion and no argument.

Is that all you have?

You have made no points which need understanding.

You have made no serious effort to either understand my points or to explain any points which you may have.

Why are you posting if you have nothing to post?

 

LMAO. how is what I said emotional?

wowww, how old are you, i'm just curious?

 

I would have to agree with this. It is a failure.

 

if ya can't beat'em, report'em. and if ya can't do that, ignore'em

i like your style will