1. Advertising
    y u no do it?

    Advertising (learn more)

    Advertise virtually anything here, with CPM banner ads, CPM email ads and CPC contextual links. You can target relevant areas of the site and show ads based on geographical location of the user if you wish.

    Starts at just $1 per CPM or $0.10 per CPC.

No code Programming language

Discussion in 'Programming' started by earncef, Nov 8, 2005.

  1. #1
    Check out limnor.com. Limnor is a no code programming language. I like it a lot. Do you guys think it is going to survive for long???
     
    earncef, Nov 8, 2005 IP
    MattBeard likes this.
  2. dave487

    dave487 Peon

    Messages:
    701
    Likes Received:
    20
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    I always find it takes longer to learn how to use the software with things like this than it does to learn how to write the code for a particular program.
     
    dave487, Nov 8, 2005 IP
  3. FFMG

    FFMG Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,091
    Likes Received:
    39
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    160
    #3
    It looks nice, but I don't think it will be used a lot.
    It might be easy to program small "hello world" programs with it, but I doubt it can be used to create fast, secure and complex applications.

    Microsoft tried a while ago with VB and is trying again with C# but even they need a certain amount of code to create good, flexible commercial applications.

    FFMG
     
    FFMG, Nov 8, 2005 IP
  4. JCDev

    JCDev Peon

    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    But it is code, just in a different way :)

    Different people think differently. It may find a niche in the designer community. Programmers will continue to do what they've always done.
     
    JCDev, Nov 8, 2005 IP
  5. temp_12000

    temp_12000 Peon

    Messages:
    316
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    looks like a simplified version of VB3.0, :)
     
    temp_12000, Nov 10, 2005 IP
  6. flash_f

    flash_f Peon

    Messages:
    21
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    I don't think it will be used a lot
     
    flash_f, Dec 9, 2005 IP
  7. jimrthy

    jimrthy Guest

    Messages:
    283
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    It's windows-only. That kills my interest in it.
     
    jimrthy, Dec 9, 2005 IP
  8. profs77

    profs77 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    441
    Likes Received:
    39
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    118
    #8
    I agree with dave487, its easier just to learn the language and survive that way. Its probably more powerful if you know the language as well.
     
    profs77, Dec 11, 2005 IP
  9. cornelius

    cornelius Peon

    Messages:
    206
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    nagh, programming is sort of like translating between human thinking and machine thinking, and the two are very different

    u can try to bridge the 2 together using high level languages such as java


    anyways as someone pointed out microsoft tried making language for non programmers Visual Basic what happened? its buggy unsecure and crap so microsoft had to scrap it

    designers will be designers, programmers will be programmers
     
    cornelius, Dec 13, 2005 IP
  10. theblackjacker

    theblackjacker Peon

    Messages:
    52
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #10
    How can a programinglanguage without code work?
     
    theblackjacker, Dec 20, 2005 IP
  11. jimrthy

    jimrthy Guest

    Messages:
    283
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #11
    I don't know anything about limnor. But, off the top of my head, here's one way to write a "no code" programming language (sort of). Actually, I think this is pretty much the way VB worked.

    Start with a bunch of controls, with lots of properties to customize their behaviour. Add a pretty GUI for dragging/dropping them around on a page. Tie it all together with a runtime library that does all the actual work.

    In VB, for the most part, programmers had to write code to, for example, handle button click events. Looks like limnor has gotten around that by creating a GUI for setting up program flow and event handling.

    Then make it extensible by the people who write code, and you have it.

    The only problem I have with stuff like this is that it's usually impossible to do things the language designers didn't plan on in advance.
     
    jimrthy, Dec 20, 2005 IP
  12. jimrthy

    jimrthy Guest

    Messages:
    283
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #12
    Definitely more powerful.

    But a RAD or GUI designer can speed things up immensely. Learning to use a complex one in the first place might take longer than just learning a given programming language.

    But, in the long-term, assuming it's a decent IDE and doesn't interfere with writing code when you actually need it, you can get huge productivity gains from it.
     
    jimrthy, Dec 20, 2005 IP
  13. caltommy69

    caltommy69 Peon

    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #13
    The first AOHell used Whalex scripting then moved on to VB (I especially loved Sendkeys :) )
     
    caltommy69, Dec 26, 2005 IP
  14. MattBeard

    MattBeard Peon

    Messages:
    259
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #14
    IMHO it is still code, it is just a graphical programming language rather than a text based one. It may well suit some people - and so they will prefer to use it.
     
    MattBeard, Jan 1, 2006 IP
  15. Lisper

    Lisper Guest

    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #15
    From the site:

    with a bunch of end user stuff listed after it.

    That is not functional programming - this is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_programming

    That said it seems to be well thought out and not very expensive. Might be useful for people who don't want to learn to program and want to make some simple programs.
     
    Lisper, Jan 1, 2006 IP