News: Republican Morale Low - DP P&R Section Suffers

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by GeorgeB., Oct 8, 2008.

  1. GeorgeB.

    GeorgeB. Notable Member

    Messages:
    5,695
    Likes Received:
    288
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    280
    #21
    My thoughts are that first of all you are right, I did get a little nasty there and it wasn't necessary. It was a product of my frustration because you were saying I was ridiculing them and when I explained that I wasn't you even went as far as to tell me to "not play those damn semantic games".

    The problem I think is that we are both having 2 separate discussions. My statements were intended to be purely political. And even furthermore I agree with you on the chance to live, line of thought. If the baby has a chance to live outside the womb then by all means it should not be aborted.

    It's just that in my opinion it's a moot point because at that point the woman has been pregnant for well over 3 months. I think 3 months is more than enough time to decide whether or not you are capable of raising a child. It's plenty of time to get help, seek advice, and really sit down and think about it.

    It's just the people that don't even want to give the woman even that much that concerns me.
     
    GeorgeB., Oct 9, 2008 IP
  2. GeorgeB.

    GeorgeB. Notable Member

    Messages:
    5,695
    Likes Received:
    288
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    280
    #22
    The Bradley factor is still a distinct possibility.
     
    GeorgeB., Oct 9, 2008 IP