Tim Lambert on the latest attempt to claim that there is no scientific consensus on global warming: http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2007/08/classifying_abstracts_on_globa.php
Actually, the article you link to is precisely the opposite of your thread title. It points up some weaknesses in the methodology of some key papers used to deny a "consensus" exists. Excerpts: (the author's emphasis). And there is much more. The thread title is misleading.
short for "Refutation of Newest Claim That There is No Scientific Concensus on Global Warming" (which didn't fit)