New SEO tool - would like to hear your comments

Discussion in 'Websites' started by nullbit, Feb 20, 2005.

  1. #1
    I would be very appreciative of your comments. Mostly, I'm interested in your thoughts on the tool itself, how it can be improved, and such.

    The tool's purpose is summarised on the front page.

    The tool requires registration to function. I do not sell/share/spam email addresses, or share any other details.

    The tool is located here:
    http://www.webmasterbrain.com/

    Thank you.
     
    nullbit, Feb 20, 2005 IP
  2. ProductivePC

    ProductivePC Peon

    Messages:
    362
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    I like the tool thus far. I will have to wait until I see the data on there. Off the bat, if I may offer a suggestion. I would offer an easier way to add keyword phrases for the same domain. So you don't have to keep typing it out.... something to the effect of after the first keyword phrase is entered, instead of taking them to a close link within a separate window... take them to a add another keyword or close window.... other than that I have to look at the rest
     
    ProductivePC, Feb 20, 2005 IP
  3. nullbit

    nullbit Peon

    Messages:
    489
    Likes Received:
    19
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    You make a good point. I'm gonna add that to my to-do-list.

    Thank you.

    By the way, your stats will probably be updated now.
     
    nullbit, Feb 20, 2005 IP
  4. ProductivePC

    ProductivePC Peon

    Messages:
    362
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    I sent you an e-mail with other comments.
     
    ProductivePC, Feb 22, 2005 IP
  5. nullbit

    nullbit Peon

    Messages:
    489
    Likes Received:
    19
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    Thanks. I just replied.
     
    nullbit, Feb 22, 2005 IP
  6. Crazy_Rob

    Crazy_Rob I seen't it!

    Messages:
    13,157
    Likes Received:
    1,366
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #6
    Does this use the API?
     
    Crazy_Rob, Feb 22, 2005 IP
  7. nullbit

    nullbit Peon

    Messages:
    489
    Likes Received:
    19
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    Would you consider it a bad or good thing if it did?
     
    nullbit, Feb 22, 2005 IP
  8. Crazy_Rob

    Crazy_Rob I seen't it!

    Messages:
    13,157
    Likes Received:
    1,366
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #8
    I'm just asking.
     
    Crazy_Rob, Feb 22, 2005 IP
  9. murugan

    murugan Peon

    Messages:
    165
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    i believe its without API as they did PR search (PROG) earlier.

    Just registered for the tool. have to visit after 24 hrs.
     
    murugan, Feb 22, 2005 IP
  10. Crazy_Rob

    Crazy_Rob I seen't it!

    Messages:
    13,157
    Likes Received:
    1,366
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #10
    Sounds good, I'll check it out.
     
    Crazy_Rob, Feb 22, 2005 IP
  11. nullbit

    nullbit Peon

    Messages:
    489
    Likes Received:
    19
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #11
    It will automatically notify you, when updated. 24hrs is the longest you will have to wait, it's usually far less.
     
    nullbit, Feb 22, 2005 IP
  12. nullbit

    nullbit Peon

    Messages:
    489
    Likes Received:
    19
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #12
    Thank you for everyones' suggestions thus far. So far I've managed to implement some of Wayne's (sent by email).

    Also, to anyone interested, the PageRank issue is now fixed, the tool will still show PageRank as "temporally unavailable" until later tonight, or early tomorrow, after that PageRank stats will begin appearing again.
     
    nullbit, Feb 23, 2005 IP
  13. nfzgrld

    nfzgrld Peon

    Messages:
    524
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #13
    Looks good. I'm interested to see what kind of results I see from this.
     
    nfzgrld, Feb 23, 2005 IP
  14. paymentapprovaltooslow

    paymentapprovaltooslow Banned

    Messages:
    1,038
    Likes Received:
    36
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #14
    Your sales pitch is weak..no one is gonna sign up unless you convicne them, whihc you havn;t done very well. And the logo sucks...change it..I hate the colors and the 70's disco lettering.
     
    paymentapprovaltooslow, Feb 23, 2005 IP
  15. Crazy_Rob

    Crazy_Rob I seen't it!

    Messages:
    13,157
    Likes Received:
    1,366
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #15
    Do you ever have anything nice to say?

    You're miserable! :mad:
     
    Crazy_Rob, Feb 23, 2005 IP
  16. nullbit

    nullbit Peon

    Messages:
    489
    Likes Received:
    19
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #16
    You have some thoughtful points, even if you could have been a little more subtle.

    My signup rate is a lot more than 0 though, the tools free - it's not a sales pitch, more a summary of main features to let the user decide him/her self if they find it of interest.

    I think you're right about the logo. I hadn't really noticed the 70's throwback typeface, until you pointed it out.

    Thanks for the input.
     
    nullbit, Feb 23, 2005 IP
  17. paymentapprovaltooslow

    paymentapprovaltooslow Banned

    Messages:
    1,038
    Likes Received:
    36
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #17
    I am blunt because it gets the point accross. And people respond better to blunt comments than subtle ones.

    Despite your service is free, you still need a better pitch just so that people think its worthwhile to sign up. A few lines of detail is good, but ellaborate. Perhaps you could have a premium service and charge? That way people can transition from the free service to the premium service when they want more features.
     
    paymentapprovaltooslow, Feb 23, 2005 IP
  18. riziko

    riziko Peon

    Messages:
    189
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #18
    I would consider it a good thing. If you are screen scraping you could get in trouble for "sending automated queries" to google which is against their terms.

    Ross
     
    riziko, Feb 23, 2005 IP
  19. ProductivePC

    ProductivePC Peon

    Messages:
    362
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #19
    I believe the point that was trying to come across is it is okay to be blunt however there is such a thing as using tact when answering. I too am extremely blunt however; tact is always good and you still get your point across. Being too blunt without tact just makes people feel as if that person is extremely immature, young or plain and simple has not grown up yet. Tact is something that comes with age and experience.

    I am not knocking you. Just giving some experience from someone else's attitude that is "If you don't want to know the answer then don't ask the question because I will tell you".
     
    ProductivePC, Feb 23, 2005 IP
  20. paymentapprovaltooslow

    paymentapprovaltooslow Banned

    Messages:
    1,038
    Likes Received:
    36
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #20
    Good luck with the site though.
     
    paymentapprovaltooslow, Feb 24, 2005 IP