New BBC homepage - Best homepage ever?

Discussion in 'HTML & Website Design' started by CanaryWoolf, Feb 29, 2008.

  1. #1
    I think I'm right in saying that with the exeption of Search Engines and Social Networking sites it is the most visited website in the world.

    For a long time they have stuck to the 800 x 600 resolution format (sadly the rest of the site is still in the old format, but wow take a look at the new homepage - It is taking functionality and design to a new level, I love it what are your thoughts?

    www.bbc.co.uk

    CW
     
    CanaryWoolf, Feb 29, 2008 IP
  2. twistedspikes

    twistedspikes Notable Member

    Messages:
    5,694
    Likes Received:
    293
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    280
    #2
    Looks a bit bland...:/

    It sticks to good standards on it's design and code, which is a good thing.

    I wouldn't say it's any more functional than the old site though.
     
    twistedspikes, Feb 29, 2008 IP
  3. wisdomtool

    wisdomtool Moderator Staff

    Messages:
    15,826
    Likes Received:
    1,367
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    455
    #3
    I like it for its simplicity and neatness especially ease of navigation. The most important is it is totally uncluttered by adverts.
     
    wisdomtool, Feb 29, 2008 IP
  4. wd_2k6

    wd_2k6 Peon

    Messages:
    1,740
    Likes Received:
    54
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    Yes BBC have some serious ownage..
    Hmm problem is i have to horizontal scroll a bit now because i have sidebar open!
     
    wd_2k6, Feb 29, 2008 IP
  5. digitalmatch

    digitalmatch Peon

    Messages:
    444
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    Not bad. I like it. It still looks pretty up tp date.
     
    digitalmatch, Feb 29, 2008 IP
  6. mcfox

    mcfox Wind Maker

    Messages:
    7,526
    Likes Received:
    716
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #6
    Oooh! Much better than the dreary page they have been using for years. I hope they offer some more customisation options and also roll it out across the rest of the site.
     
    mcfox, Feb 29, 2008 IP
  7. innovati

    innovati Peon

    Messages:
    948
    Likes Received:
    63
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    very slow loading here, and I've got broadband naturally.

    To me it seems to pull off the customization aspect of things very well, but will it be usable or gimmicky after 4 years?

    I know the big drag and drop sorting of your stuff is what they're after, but once you have it that way you want it it doesn't matter how easy it is to change it.....once you've got it the way you want it you don't mess with it anwyay.
     
    innovati, Feb 29, 2008 IP
  8. juan-roman

    juan-roman Peon

    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    I think it looks a bit too:
    - bloggy.
    - much like a social networking site.
    - generic (or bland as twistedspikes said).
    - much like it could look dated all too soon.

    A few bits of possible nitpicking:
    - the big rounded corners are kind of irritating.
    - the background colours of the boxes changing seems a bit of a gimmick, but I admit I do quite like it.

    Having said all that, it looks very easy to use and it's a marked improvement on the old site and finally, on an irrelevant sidenote, as long as they keep the content the along the same lines it should still be a great site.


    JR
     
    juan-roman, Feb 29, 2008 IP
  9. EGS

    EGS Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,078
    Likes Received:
    438
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    290
    #9
    Maybe in England, but not the world.
    It's a .co.uk domain. :rolleyes: Bland statement. .com = most visited worldwide. Google.com, MySpace.com, Facebook.com, Yahoo.com, cnn.com, cnet.com, download.com...all have more traffic.
     
    EGS, Feb 29, 2008 IP
  10. CanaryWoolf

    CanaryWoolf Peon

    Messages:
    114
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #10
    Well you quoted me as saying "with the exception of Search Engines and Social Networking sites" and then quoted Search Engines and Social Networking sites -nice.

    OK here a link to the Global top 500 and (almost) with the exception of the afore mentioned it's right up there.

    http://www.alexa.com/site/ds/top_sites?ts_mode=global&lang=none

    And yes it is a .co.uk but BBC is a worldwide brand

    :rolleyes: back to you.

    CW
     
    CanaryWoolf, Feb 29, 2008 IP
  11. EGS

    EGS Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,078
    Likes Received:
    438
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    290
    #11
    Obvious n00b webmaster using Alexa to determine traffic and popularity.. :rolleyes:
    Maybe if Alexa actually provided a statistics tool or website monitor service that all "the big sites" used I would believe you.
     
    EGS, Feb 29, 2008 IP
  12. innovati

    innovati Peon

    Messages:
    948
    Likes Received:
    63
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #12
    I am in canada and although there's an ocean between us, there are still BBC followers here and some of their stories end up in our news. BBC is a global brand.

    it would be silly for something like CTV to be anything but CTV.ca but it sure doesn't limit access to users from other countries.

    It wasn't till recently that the US got a /us and it's kind of tacky, that's why american companies don't use it.
     
    innovati, Feb 29, 2008 IP
  13. CanaryWoolf

    CanaryWoolf Peon

    Messages:
    114
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #13
    Get lost :mad: - I don't use Alexa - just using it to help reinforce my point, one that you clearly haven't got to grips with - you completely misinterupted my statement and have failed to make a useful one yourself.

    I don't want to get into a 'across the pond' slanging match but unless you have something useful to say and better still something to back your arguements up then 'hush'! (my that was polite)

    Anyway back to the actual point of the post - do you like / dislike the site?

    CW
     
    CanaryWoolf, Feb 29, 2008 IP
  14. jsb

    jsb Guest

    Messages:
    100
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #14
    Allowing the visitor to customize their experience is always a good thing, and it has a ton of that. What it needs though, is a SPLASH of color ;-)
     
    jsb, Feb 29, 2008 IP
  15. AstarothSolutions

    AstarothSolutions Peon

    Messages:
    2,680
    Likes Received:
    77
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #15
    The BBC isnt about colour (and to the previous poster, the BBC will never have ads on any of its technically UK based services) though :)

    I think it is ok.... given how long "web parts" (and each other brands/ technologies names for these type of portal sites) have been around I have always been surprised just how few there are... nice to see someone putting at least a little design to them though.

    They are fairly easy to create but have always been disappointed that there has never been a project that warrants using them as it is only really necessary for a massive site with a diverse content type where realistically people are going to have it as their homepage/ very frequently repeat visited
     
    AstarothSolutions, Feb 29, 2008 IP
  16. walkere

    walkere Active Member

    Messages:
    112
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    58
    #16
    Beat me to it. I was about to link to that... =P

    BBC is currently about 60 in traffic ranking. If you look at historical stats, though, it peaked in 2006 at around 17-18.

    The fact that it's a co.uk domain doesn't mean only British people use it. People worldwide use the BBC for news (including Americans), and I'm sure it's popular in much of the former British Empire.

    Anyhow, I like the design. However, the javascript is a bit laggy in responding. There's a one second lag time or so between when I click a content box and it starts to drag. It could also use a little color spice-up.

    - Walkere
     
    walkere, Feb 29, 2008 IP