Neeley v NAMEMEDIA INC ,Google Inc, Network Solutions

Discussion in 'General Marketing' started by CurtisNeeley, Jan 23, 2010.

  1. #1
    Copyright violation and trademark infringgement.[​IMG]
    NamemediaS.com
    Is not the Corporate site of a Defendant and is why they sued me for violating US Title 15 1125(d). I asked the Courts to toss it out as a frivolous suit and with affirmative defenses that require it to be dismissed prejudicially.
    I sued Google for sponsoring Sleepspot.com and violating my copyrights to nudes credited to me to sell advertisements. I already complained to a Defendant ACPA agent where they could have limited their liability to 100.000 but they ignored the first notice.
    I actually spent money with AdWords after I had filed a AdSense trademark complaint. I paid for advertising a book that Google Inc and NAMEMEDIA INC conspired to violate my copyrights.
    I am never going to hire a lawyer. Lawyers are the reason I think the legal system is wrong.

    There would no need to consider punitive damages reforms is they would make contingencies illegal. If a lawyer will pay me thirty million I might let them have a 10% commission?
     
    CurtisNeeley, Jan 23, 2010 IP
  2. YugoSlavac

    YugoSlavac Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,345
    Likes Received:
    15
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    #2
    I highly doubt you're going to get $30 million dollars for your case. Plus, I barely understood what you wrote.

    Yugo,
     
    YugoSlavac, Jan 23, 2010 IP
  3. CurtisNeeley

    CurtisNeeley Peon

    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    Google already settled for ninety million in Arkansas for a click fraud case and NAMEMEDIA INC already settled a cybersquatting case with ICANN for EXACTLY the same reason.
    Have you read any of the hundreds of pages of litigation between Vulcan Golf and Google Inc? I have read every filed document except the RICO portions. My case is much stronger than Vulcan Golf case was and they would have already settled to get out if it wasn't overblown by lawyers.
    My case will slam the doors shut for parts of Adsense and Adwords business forever.
    Google will be harmed more if they realized how much money they make at oriceline.com
    oriceline.com is a parked page that Google profits on while cybersquatting their OWN advertiser PRICELINE.COM.
    It can't get any more cut and dried than this.
    It is over -forever-.
     
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2010
    CurtisNeeley, Jan 23, 2010 IP
  4. internetmarketingiq

    internetmarketingiq Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,552
    Likes Received:
    70
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    165
    #4
    Good luck with that. Looks like it's the money you really care about.

    Get the best lawyer you can. You wouldn't get surgery from a Doctor who had never been to medical school.
     
    internetmarketingiq, Jan 23, 2010 IP
  5. CurtisNeeley

    CurtisNeeley Peon

    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    Money is not the main issue but it is the main thing that I think will change the world.
    I will not hire a lawyer because I believe law is not similar to a doctor although that is a humorous comparison.

    I will teach each the Defendants that law is usually either logical or wrong.

    Copyright law in America was a right that was licensed instead of recognized as it should have been.

    1) Benjamin Huntington was the man who introduced the first copyright law in June 23, 1789. What was his profession? A printer, painter, or a poet you might guess. The law was originally wrote by Mr Webster who started a popular dictionary. Benjamin Huntington felt his profession was more important than for him to serve in the American Revolution. He felt his studies were more important....
    What WERE his studies?
    He was a LAWYER!
    Copyright has always been the rights that LAWYERS sold licenses to instead of recognizing as a self-evident right.

    2) Who was one remarkable writer who had his copyrights violated first around 1599? It is hard to pin down the date that it was violated.
    It was printed in his name against his wishes.
    "The Passionate Pilgrim" was the "book".
    The man who wrote and had a story published without his permission was Shakespeare.

    How many copyright lawyers know these two facts?
    *************************************************

    I am alive today due to doctors. My spouse once removed my respirator to allow me to die after over six weeks of non-responsive coma.
    Doctors and lawyers are in no way comparable. Doctors posses a skill that they studied and use. Lawyers do absolutely nothing except learn how to manipulate arguments and agree to pay for arguing. The are not any better at stating it is wrong to commit murder or theft. Applying the rules is all they do. I will never hire a lawyer. I was countersued for 100K and will have that suit thrown out. It will either be a Summary Judgment or will only make it more expensive for them.
    It is not about money, but money is all that apparently matters to lawyers.
     
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2010
    CurtisNeeley, Jan 23, 2010 IP
  6. CurtisNeeley

    CurtisNeeley Peon

    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    The case is over except for lawyering it up to make it more costly for them.

    I am angry and they have done everything I asked already except giving me thirty-million dollars and not advertising registration expiration dates and having parked pages. Oops I suppose there is a lot left to do.
     
    CurtisNeeley, Jan 31, 2010 IP