Need some opinion about website design!

Discussion in 'Design' started by jerrytoms, Sep 6, 2021.

?

Did you like my work?

  1. Yes, sure, good job.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. You need to make some changes to improve the design

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. Man, share more experience and get more skills to work with such projects.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. #1
    Hello guys. I'm a UI/UX designer with a small experience. I worked on small projects before. Made simple websites using HTML, CSS, and some Javascript. Just recently I've been asked to create this website https://RealSpyApps.com. This is my best project thus far, could you give me any pointers on how I could improve? I'm still a junior designer and looking for all possible feedback. I've spent a lot of time on this client :)

    upload_2021-9-7_2-25-4.jpeg

    upload_2021-9-7_2-25-14.jpeg

    And some mobile version screenshots:
    upload_2021-9-7_2-25-40.jpeg
    upload_2021-9-7_2-27-40.jpeg

    Tell me what you think, please.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 6, 2021
    jerrytoms, Sep 6, 2021 IP
  2. mmerlinn

    mmerlinn Prominent Member

    Messages:
    3,197
    Likes Received:
    819
    Best Answers:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    320
    #2
    Error 520 is not a good website.
     
    mmerlinn, Sep 7, 2021 IP
  3. deathshadow

    deathshadow Acclaimed Member

    Messages:
    9,732
    Likes Received:
    1,999
    Best Answers:
    253
    Trophy Points:
    515
    #3
    The use of EM/REM is broken thanks to the 10px declaration on Body, flipping the bird at the very audience EM/REM is for. The thin-glyph webfont on the body text lowers the contrast level below WCAG minimums even though your declaration is AA compliant. With that font I would treat AAA normal as the actual MINIMUM because it's a blurry mess on cleartype and freetype. (lemme guess, Mac user with their "everything is blurry and bold"?)

    The ATTEMPT at being responsive... isn't for me as a non-standard font metric user, again the mixing of PX and REM the likely culprit.

    The goofy bloated animated trash is a waste of screen space and bandwidth, which mated to the train wreck laundry list of how NOT to write HTML that is turdpress? Well, the site is a bloated slow loading disaster. Combined with the lack of proper semantics, it's a giant middle finger to usability and accessibility.
     
    deathshadow, Sep 25, 2021 IP
  4. shalom_m

    shalom_m Member

    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    12
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    33
    #4
    • Contrast too low.
    • Found it hard to read – I love thin glyphs but the come at a terrible price.
    • Layout in the tablet range not well thought out.
    • From an SEO angle – the page is too long with too many concepts to be viable.
     
    shalom_m, Nov 27, 2021 IP