Need feedback for online store!

Discussion in 'Websites' started by danthemarketman, May 4, 2016.

  1. #1
    Hello everyone,

    I'd like some constructive feedback on my Ecommerce site www.watertecdrip.com

    Answers to these questions would be great:

    -What is my store about?
    -Would you buy from this store, why or why not?
    -What would you change?

    Thank you very much!
     
    danthemarketman, May 4, 2016 IP
  2. Nigel Lew

    Nigel Lew Notable Member

    Messages:
    4,642
    Likes Received:
    406
    Best Answers:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    295
    #2
    Strange use of real estate results in it not being entirely mobile any longer, largely uninspired visually but that is somewhat academic given the demographic really.

    Fairly obvious what the site does, no real inherent reason to not buy something though. Seems safe enough etc.

    I would have done it full screen for starters but I have frankly seen much worse. Empty forum is largely a moot point as well. I would focus on the blog end of things in that regard.

    Given what someone started with I am a tad stumped at how things arrive there visually.

    hope that helps a bit. Tad swamped over here lol..

    N.
     
    Nigel Lew, May 4, 2016 IP
  3. sarahk

    sarahk iTamer Staff

    Messages:
    28,797
    Likes Received:
    4,531
    Best Answers:
    123
    Trophy Points:
    665
    #3
    I reckon you're doing lots right. The site is easy to use, everything flows as you'd expect it to. The forum is really simple and that's appropriate given that it's really just "ask us a question" rather than a "community". The blog index isn't quite right but it does the job. Your about page is excellent and I'd repeat the shipping info on the contact page. One of the first things I look for is "where are these guys". If I can't work that out then I'm gone.

    FWIW I'd get Google Places to put you on the map. The google street view is so fuzzy you can't read your signage - and yes, I check that before I buy too :)
     
    sarahk, May 4, 2016 IP