Please dont answer a junk answer on here just to get a worthless comment signature backlink Ok here goes: Im realizing something.... Google has an equation to determine what is a natural linking pattern For instance, say a site has 100 backlinks........... and 97 of them are "do follow", 3 are "no follow" Google says ok this cant be... this is unnatural linking.... because 99.9999999999% of the time websites have about 60-70% dofollow, and about 30-40% nofollow Therefore.... it now sets off a trigger to analyze the site in question even more Now... it looks at the anchor of the backlinks 100 of them have anchor text.... 0 has just the link itself without anchor Again... this is unnatural Sites such as digitalpoint.com probably have 10000's of backlinks.... and they will say: http://www.digitalpoint.com Digital Point DP DP Forum Digitalpoint Forum Website Click Here etc. Google knows thats natural What do you Google Experts out there think the equation for natural linking is? Here is my guess: 1) 70% of links should have an anchor, 30% should have the website domain only - Of that 70% ..... around 75% should have the anchor of the site name....... the rest of the 25% should have many different variations 2) 70% should be do follow...... 30% should be no follow 3) There should be a mix of directory links, etc. ........ but blog comment links should only make about 10-15% What do you guys think????? - FBos