So, which meaning of the word faggot were you meaning? Edit: Aaaah, I see you changed your post. I'm sure you can express yourself better without being offensive to users who aren't even in this conversation.
Yeah I noticed what you meant after I re-read it a bit. I use faggot as in a d*ckhead etc. Not the gay application I would have used something different, but I'm not in the mood for an infraction! Yeah I probably can... hmm... maybe "If they die, I would consider the world a happier place"?
Dishonest Gtech again posts his lies. If you even looked at the source, you would have notice that plea agreement was from November 2006. And in your opinion, how many American criminals ( I refuse to call these criminals, soldiers) have raped teenage girls and killed her family that you assume I can just find one in random? No you didn't answer, you just posted a general nonsense about rapists in general to avoid condemning your hero's actions. The truth is that you admire those criminals and you wish you had the balls to be there, so you could also participate in those acts. Be a man for once and have the balls to stand for your belief and admit that you look at these criminals as your heroes.
That's so touching! That's, perhaps, the nicest thing I've seen in this thread about a very large group of people (40%) that want to introduce sharia law into the UK. But, the question that comes to mind is, how do you know it misrepresents islam? Because just a week or two ago, you openly admitted you knew nothing about islam/quran (words to the affect). So here, you are introducing speculation and showing a pre-conceived bias. Excellent use of moral equivalence! I'm duly impressed! There is no if about it, they are and has been well documented, which is actually a part of this discussion. Who is not supporting them, and where exactly are those voices of moderation? Whose thinking should be changed? Those that want to introduce sharia as British law, or those that oppose it? Are people wrong for opposing it? Is it insensitive to be against a religious law that treats women with disrespect and allows for stoning people to death for various petty crimes? I've not seen any moderate thoughts. It would be helpful if you could identify a post which you believe does what you claim. There is no "moderate" version of islam. If you read the quran and the information being presented, you might get a better understanding of a subject you currently have no idea about. Conservative generally, with some "liberal leanings" on a few select issues.
So I was correct, your hatred for soldiers continues to shine as you attempt to paint all with the same brush. There's that "all" card Incorrect as usual. It's right next to the bad words you had for terrorists. Didn't you see it? Will you ever be saying anything bad about terrorists? And why do you want the US to pull out of Iraq so terrorists can take over?
The game is up Gtech, you don't fool anyone with this nonsense. Your post has nothing to do with my post and actually is contrary to what I posted. Everyone can clearly see that you look at those rapists and murderers as your heroes. I bet you wish you had the balls to join the army so you participate in those criminal acts. Is there any one here who has not noticed that dishonest Gtech refuses to condemn the actions of rapists and murderers?
Actually, I read your posts, like this one: And it sounds to me like you really hate soldiers...you are even calling them criminals. If they are the criminals, who are our friends? Would that be the terrorists? This I am too curious about....if you hate the US and soldiers so much, then why not move to Iraq with the non-criminals, oops, I mean terrorists?
Will you ever be saying anything bad about terrorists? And why do you want the US to pull out of Iraq so terrorists can take over?
my understanding about koran has nothing to do with it, it is just logical to be against the terrorist in their interpeation of islam. i also agree with heritage foundation that it is a good idea to try to isolate the terrorist and expose their interpetation of koran as false. so i take the side of people that oppose their view. facts are facts and i use all facts to prove my point. well atleast we agree on something i am talking about people like nokiaking and the other day someone was trying to explain to you that there is no refrence to killing jews and christian i will try to look it up for you if you want. and again right now with your final sentence. i have no intension of doing that at this time but you keep on missing the point and try to defend your position. if you can read it look for a way to prove that these guys are wrong and present that rather than supporting the terrorists point of view. you no longer have to prove there are terrorista and they have supporters but now is the time to fight them and they way of thinking then you should be able to read and understand the point of the article i posted and try it for a while it might let you comunicate a little better with the people you are trying to cooperate with you.
In general, it's pretty clear that gworld, pizzaboy and nokiaking have gone to great lengths to silence anyone discussing real issues. gworld, I expect it from. He only bashes Christians, Jews, Americans, Soldiers and dmoz for the most part. In fact, if you go back through this thread, his outrage has never once been directed at the issues or the extremists, just those who are commenting on them. That's part for gworld, don't think anyone expects any less of him. pizzaboy is trying the silencing method again that he tried last week regarding kerry. Not addressing the issues, except when cornered to do so and even then, it was nothing short of dismal pacificst diatribe. But really, he's already admitted he has no knowledge on the subject. His issue is with the messengers, not the actual message. Nokiaking, as I pointed out early on today, wanted to steer clear of the actual issues and make the messengers the issue. And for the most part, I've let him have is way. Still in denial, even when overwhelming evidence (even direct scriptures with sources). Good teamwork guys! Those wanting to impose sharia law in the UK would be very proud of your efforts today. On a scale of 1 to 72 virgins, I'd give all three of you 1.5 grandmas for your digital jihad efforts
I am just trying to show you a better way to fight the terrorist ideology nokiaking is trying to seperate himself and his religion from the terrorists which is exactly what we need to support Gworld is saying that your effort to blame islam for the actions of a few is not a good aproach and there are good and bad in every bunch what you fail to see is that we are a step ahead of you and we are trying to fight these guys and you are stock at first bese saying that there are ppl that are terrorist and we better watch out and fight.
There is reference to killing Christians and Jews in the quran. When someone lies and says it doesn't exist, as nokiaking did regarding apes and pigs earlier, I counter those claims. Oddly enough, you seem to overlook the lies, despite clear and concise evidence. Covered here, complete with credible references that also include three translations for each: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=1132348&postcount=37 Let me know your thoughts. I hope you are not saying "we" (or should I say "you?") should condone lying and disinformation. That's why I cite sources, such as the actual verses from the quran and hadith that reference Christians and Jews as apes and pigs. References, such as above, that counters deceitfulness and deliberate lies. I note that in the presence of such overwhelming information, you still take issue only with the messenger and not the one being dishonest. Your intention, just as it was last week with our thread on kerry is nothing more than to silence those that are aware. I can assure you, like last week, that won't be happening. Find another angle. Read, learn, check those resources and references, and come to your own "honest" conclusions and stop letting others think for you.
How? But at the same time standing up for them? What is your definition of a few? It seems to me that there have been more terrorists killed than US troops...would you say that only a few US troops have been killed?
If step ahead means silencing others and appeasing terrorists, I'd say you guys are way behind the curve. Your attempts to rewrite what has actually taken place are less than shameful. Have you ever considered honesty?
1800flowers . com delivers chocolates and flowers, but I'm not sure if they do aroma therapy candles. Gworld would know
its 11 pm here and it seems that i just keep on missing you. as a strategy i want to support the view of the people and the view that say islam is a friendly religion rather than the people and the view that says islam requires violance. i want to support them promote their idea and assist them as much as i can even here. to support my idea that this is the best aproach i presented http://www.heritage.org/Research/NationalSecurity/em1019.cfm please read this carefully it seems to be a very good strategy in this war against terrorists, point 7,8 and 9 seems to be where we disagree on but please read the whole thing. this is the latest game plan from a conservetive point of view so maybe you can support it.
As I suspected. You are not interested in facts; facts don't matter. That explains why in the presence of facts, they are disregarded completely. Well, at least you admit that you want to be naive and gullible. No, I will not be supporting deliberate lies nor anyone who openly admits that not only do they not know about the subject, but now claims that they are not interested in facts. At least you confirmed my assumptions. Time for the ignore button. Useless drivel.