Moderator please help me (Itarder Issue)

Discussion in 'Support & Feedback' started by Irfi0009, Apr 22, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. #1
    Hello Sir,

    I have one problem, One of person (MudiW) has buy a service from me few months ago, at that time he has give me positive feedback in service thread and also he has give me (+ve) itrader also, at that time when I ask for payment and he told me that there is some problem in his paypal account so he will send me payment later, after that I have give him so many times reminder regarding payment but he has not send my payment, so almost 2 months are passed away and at the end I decide to give him (-ve) itrader to him,

    When I gave him (-ve) itrader he has also give me (-ve) for same service for which he has already give me (+ve) itrader, here is detail of his itrader and positive feedback post for my service

    http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=10815189&postcount=19 (his positive feed back in my service thread after buying my service)

    http://forums.digitalpoint.com/itrader_detail.php?ir=359135&u=132755 (he has given me positive itrader when I finish the work and sent him report)

    http://forums.digitalpoint.com/itrader_detail.php?ir=378239&u=132755 (he has given me (-ve) itrader when I give him (-ve) itrader for the same service)

    Is any person can give more then one itrader for same service?

    Please do something for me, please remove that (-ve) rating from my profile and give some punishment to (MudiW), I hope you can under stand my problem

    If i am wrong at any point please feel free to tell me,

    Waiting for your positive response for me,

    Thanks,
    Vineet Maheshari
     
    Irfi0009, Apr 22, 2009 IP
  2. jhmattern

    jhmattern Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    8,909
    Likes Received:
    794
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    455
    #2
    Leaving a second iTrader because you change your mind constitutes iTrader abuse. Thanks for the heads up.
     
    jhmattern, Apr 22, 2009 IP
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.