Michigan GOP Move To Kick Ron Paul Out Of Debates Dropped

It's because of his strong belief in personal privacy and small government. Every conspiracy theorist's wish. That doesn't make it wrong or crazy to stand for those kind of things though.

 

Some more "conspiracy"

Anyone have the video where RP has agreed to join kucinich in launching a new investigation into WT7? Whoa, say it isn't so! A "conpsiracy?"

 

Switch and bait! No on is arguing this. Was this in response to the video? Or did we ignore it like the other information I'm providing that seems to have left everyone speechless?

 

Compared to the other 9 mind numbing pricks in the debate it's pretty clear that the guy actually cares for the American people (that includes people like GT and dGTman if they are indeed not the same person) yet still GTech plays the "conspiracy card" just like Americas fake mayor Giuliani will be playing the 9/11 card so so heavily the FOX Noobs viewers will be lapping it up like the dumbass brainwashed sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeple that they are.

 

I am for a smaller govt....but not for ron paul, in that he is a conspiracy theory nutjob....but I guess thats why the dems love him, they tend to love nutjobs.

 

you really need to read this book

 

Fantastic post d16man.

I would not have expected anything less from you.

GTech has groomed you well.

 

No, I hadn't seen the latest video, but it didn't really bother me. All he says is that he'd like to see it investigated more thoroughly. What's wrong with that? You have to be a fool to believe the government is somehow omnipotently incapable of a cover up or wrongdoing. He never says it was blown up by the government. Nothing that should lable him a conspiracy nut. More in line with the founding fathers who put up all these safe gaurds in the first place.

This however is still sounding more and more like a conspiracy theory about Ron Paul. Isn't that the definition? You don't have any one real solid thing, just a bunch of random small things that could or could not add up to something, but you're trumping it like it's solid fact.

 

gtech didn't have to groom...I have always thought paul was a nutjob, not unlike yourself.

 

I agree with AGS (get the F out of here, did I just say that?). There is no question that RP is tinkering with conspiracy theories and has aligned himself heavily for votes from the "truther" (which really means "liar") crowd. When alex jones is pimping you out to his conspiracy sheeple, it says a lot. Whether intentional or not.

Of course....RP could clear all this up and state unquestionably he does not beleive in these conspiracies. But then he'd lose the only voter base he has.

 

Nowhere in these videos does he say he believes 9/11 was commited by the government, which I think is the essential requirement for being a 9/11 conspiracy theorist. He says that he thinks there were government cover-ups, and to a certain extent there was. For a long time after 9/11 the American people were led to believe, by the Administration and the media, that the people who committed the attacks were linked to Saddam Hussein. The Administration knowingly used false information to do this. This is the essence of a government cover-up.

 

It may very well be that nothing would bother you about it. Of course, he made clear what he wanted in the video. Why else would the "truther" publish it? Did you have any comment on his Iran conspiracy theory I posted?

I was just re-reading your response about why RP is so heavily aligned with aj and conspiracy nuts. Is this your opinion, or are you speaking as one with expertise in this field (ie, and "truther" yourself?)

 

This, is a conspiracy unto itself. Congratulations! "Nowhere in these videos does he say he believes 9/11 was commited by the government" I never said he did. Keep it honest. Opinions are opinions.

 

Surely between the conspiracy nuts and blame America first trolls lingering around here, *someone* must know what rp is so heavily aligned with alex jones and why he offered a conspiracy theory about Iran recently? Anyone?

 

Ever since you first burst onto the P&R scene a month or so after me posting hundreds of identical posts I have always had my doubts about you mate. You sound a lot like a complete clone of GTech to me and always will do.

You and GT are the worse kind of sheeple because you are beyond recovery, that makes me sad because you are probably 2 nice guys who have just been conditioned so much that you are unable of any rational thought.

Ron Paul is trying to save America from what it has become and all you two can do is call him a nutjob. That's pretty lame-ass mate.

 

Exactly, opinions are opinions, I'm expressing mine. Nowhere did I say you said that. I was simply explaining my reasoning and that was a part of my explanation. What's the big deal?

I already commented on that video,

 

Just my opinion. I don't have any conspiracy theories that I believe in other then the ones throughout history that have been exposed as fact. At the same time I don't think it's very wise to ignore them all. I try to keep an open mind and encourage more investigation, kind of like i'm doing with your theory that Ron Paul is a conspiracy nut. I'm not convinced of your theory yet either, but keep up the research, maybe you'll find the smoking gun.

 

You say that about anyone who doesn't believe in your fairy world. Doesn't have much value anymore. Have you thought of trying something new?

 

On the Iran "conspiracy", what is the conspiracy again exactly? All I caught from the video was that he said there is growing fear that we're going to attack iran, and he states that iran doesn't have a formidable military, which they don't.

 

It eludes, even if not directly, that I had suggested such, by using it as an argument to attempt to rufute what I've said. That wasn't an explanation, it was statement.

Indeed, I read your conspiracy theory about it. Pass the tinfoil to the lefthand side?