Mens Shoes Sandals Website

Discussion in 'Websites' started by PartyRama.co.uk, Jun 30, 2008.

  1. #1
    PartyRama.co.uk, Jun 30, 2008 IP
  2. gerritpoel

    gerritpoel Active Member

    Messages:
    711
    Likes Received:
    27
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    70
    #2
    Here is my opinion:


    Domain: 7/10
    - Long
    - Hyphen
    + On Topic

    Layout: 9/10
    + Very Neat
    + Well Structured

    Design: 8.5/10
    + Clean
    + Web 2.0
    - Banner (too plain)

    Content: 8/10
    + Good Content
    - Right Side Links No content

    Features: 8.5/10
    + Good Style
    + Cart


    Overall: 41/50 - [82%]

    |llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll|llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll|
     
    gerritpoel, Jul 1, 2008 IP
  3. z-zee

    z-zee Banned

    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    The comment of that site, I give your 100 over 90
    |lllllllllll100llllllllllllll|lllllllllll90llllllllll|
     
    z-zee, Jul 1, 2008 IP
  4. siberia77

    siberia77 Active Member

    Messages:
    293
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    53
    #4
    not bad, logo could be stronger
     
    siberia77, Jul 1, 2008 IP
  5. PartyRama.co.uk

    PartyRama.co.uk Peon

    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    Thanks for your time
     
    PartyRama.co.uk, Jul 2, 2008 IP
  6. deathshadow

    deathshadow Acclaimed Member

    Messages:
    9,732
    Likes Received:
    1,999
    Best Answers:
    253
    Trophy Points:
    515
    #6
    Clean enough a layout - but again another site with absurdly undersized fixed metric fonts. I have to zoom in 50% to even make the page usable on my large fonts/120 dpi machine and there's really no excuse to be using px fonts on most of what you have done so.

    The 'product' area with the four boxes on the main page appear to be broken in both Opera and IE BTW.

    At 135 Validation errors, what you have cannot even be considered HTML. It's a table for layout so welcome to 1998, you've got classes being thrown around like crazy, 15 tables on a layout that even done using tables for layout shouldn't be more than TWO... Nothing resembling semantic markup, your use of heading tags is nonsensical at best, if you are going to use tables at LEAST use TH for the headings in the tables, etc, etc... Basically it's 18k of HTML for a site that with barely over a k of content and a handful of images shouldn't even be a third that. At 39 separate images it's also absurdly bloated given that it's a fixed width layout - I'd be suprised for most MODERN developers to use more than half that number of separate images, and if I was doing it it would likely not even break 12 images total.
     
    deathshadow, Jul 2, 2008 IP
  7. shymensport

    shymensport Active Member

    Messages:
    261
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    53
    #7
    your site will surely get many buyer ehehehehehe
    god site men!!!
     
    shymensport, Jul 2, 2008 IP