Document Inception bla bla *cough* The results are in, 10 hours ago i copied the OPs page which is a PR3 and it's "inception" was obviously before April 29th. Me = Tareeinternet.com OP = Martialarm.com Why am i beating him in 10 hours? The Title tags are showing different in the index despite the whole Head and Meta's being identical, now are you going to risk giving your "opinion" why? I also linked back to the source document, and if you want to give me a few more days i'll do some off page and completely own the SERP's for every query related to that document. So there you go, i not only duplicated the Op's article but his source code as well.
I am posting older articles that have been on my site for awhile in the larger article directories and seeing how it goes. Is there any reason I shouldn't post original content on my site on the article directories?
Well if this experiment shows that your articles placed on an articles site might knock your original page out of the search engine it may be wise to not do it. Its not proven yet but we will see. Simple way maybe shuffle the paragraphs then submit the articles. Then go back to your sites page and add another 1/4 information and text to the original article.
In a court of law it is my understanding that the "earliest indexed" article woudn't pass muster because that does not prove ownership--only who put it on the web first.
Sorry, I meant "who wrote it first" in the above post. And the only way to prove who wrote it is to get it copyrighted officially unless you had it notorized. I've had clients run into disputes with someone who copied their content and after sending a DMCA report with adequate proof of who had it online first the other party disagreed and then the host wouldn't do anything and court was the next step (some host's don't want to loose a client). Most Hosts will comply with a DMCA however if everything looks legitimate. So it's best to get some kind of proof of ownership before you ever post it online.
Bla bla you are trying to prove a point with a lame 5 word keyword term surrounded by quotes. When you decide to be a real seo and step up here with some real terms then please pound your chest about your accomplishments. Till then, you are simply distributing misinformation and unimportant dribble to webmasters who need less of that, being as the internet is filled with a great deal already.
What's up, you don't like being wrong? And what are these "real" terms? The ones you are targeting and i can't even find you in the top 100?
How about you two anti up and help me get my site to rank for martial arts I have been trying for a while then gave up to go long tail but the numbers are just not there.
Some site who steal the content gets indexed faster than the origial content owner. The one who posts the original content is not necessarily the one google index first.
Thats true, and the one indexed first isnt necessarily the one who ranks. Also when we are done with this i will 301 my page to yours so whatever authority thats passed to my URL will go to yours.. Because im pretty sure i dont really need any Martial Arts content or rankings.
That is way to funny and well kinda not ... no fun seeing your content scraped and ending up on a higher PR page higher in the serps.
Well if something this blatantly dumb is being done by google then it needs a shake up. I don't want to see my original content dumped by the engines just because a higher PR site scraped my content but will give a chance to sacrifice the page to see if it is possible. If it does happen Ill post a thousand momma jokes until his google alerts overloads
I'm wrong so often I've lost over $20,000.00 in the last 16 months, so no I have no fantasy I am as good as you. It's really early for me to pull the pimp hand, and slap the taste out of your mouth, but I have my coffee so I am good to go. You are wasting your time looking past the first page...I don't do Top 100 that is why you cannot find them. I do Top 10 Front Page Google.com here are some for you to go and learn from, police products 4 years straight # 1 2 or 3 [SIZE=-1]securityandsafetysupply.com Owner Duane text to screen # 1 new ranking firetext.tv owner Raoul (I know its a .tv right ) pda accessories # 2 extremepda.com Owner John condo investments # 8 (in time I will make it # 1) reinalliance.com Owner Sunil Richest women richestwomen.info # 1 (about a year now but bounces to #3 due to Forbes.com) [/SIZE]custom top 8 # 1 (3 months straight) profileguy.com Owner Me Of course there are many more I cannot / care not to publish. Peace!
Not necessarily. It depends on the condition of the site with the original content. If it's a new site then yes, there may be problems, but most scrapers will scrape content from sites that are ranking highly for the terms they are targeting. Those kinds of scrapers rarely rank for the words they scraped because the other site will outrank them for PR and age and probably links too. I just found one that had scraped almost every paragraph of "it's articles" from high ranking sites. That site was nowhere to be found for the words they were targeting. Google is sometimes wise where scrapers are concerned.
I too agree with it. I do have a blog where the posts are not even indexed but when I submit the post as an article it gets on the TOP.
The poll seems to state. NO, Who is indexed first is the document owner! - vote 18 ??, Ugh, they will never get it right anyway! - vote 18 Sweetfunny it seems not many believe that authority and PR can strip a site of its ranked pages. I guess we will soon see the result: Duplicate Content Knock Out Challenge