Massive links or only quality links

Good day,

I am wondering what the best options is for Link Building:

Massive submission (1000+) to directory's and irralavant websites (no 18+ or illigal)
Quality links (100+) from relevant websites and directory's.

Both..?

I am just wondering what you see as the best option.

Thanks.

 

quality over quantity, but i go with both

 

not sure how anyone could dispute quality relevant links being more important than just thousands of random links.

how often do you find yourself clicking on something completely unrelated to what you were searching for?
think adsense, everything is targeted and so should your links be is my 2cents.

 

Thanks,

I will go with both then.

 

I'd take the quality links twice thank you very much

greetz,
jobic

 

defo quality links they definately score higher with Google.

 

I'd go for quiality links, they are much more worth the work and the money than just buying thousends of useless links all over the internet...

 

Quality takes preference over Quantity for sure. There should be logic involved in link building than just working hard. Build a group of people, ask them what resource they use for link build and do it all manually. That brings more results. Also don't forget to post on in DP and other forums, they also give you link back.

 

Quality links ofcourse

 

both has own importance massive submission will increase your backlinks and traffics.

Quality links are most important part of your site to become quality site and to get good PR.

For example you can see some forums which has same PR as DP but traffics are low and thats why generally we get reply within one or two days and here we get quick reply due to traffics.

Through quality links you can get good PR and traffics too but for lots of traffics we always prefer massive link building service like directory submission, forum posting, blog commenting and posting etc.

Thanks

 

I think Matt has it right. Get as many quality ones as you can, but don't stop submitting to the web directories, blogs, etc. Use the lower quality links to focus your link text to specific keywords.

 

Of course Quality is better but Sometime quality is hard to find.

 

One pr 3 link has more value than 100 pr 0 link.

 

Quality link is better option.if you get link from relevent site it is better than getting links form irrelevent sites.

 

Quality links is a way better approach but if you are going for multiple keyword rankings then you will need quantity undoubtedly. So... a combination of both I say.

 

100 relevant vs 1000 crap links, i pick quality

100 relevant vs 500,000 crap links, i pick quantity in this case

 

Quality for sure and then quality-in-the-right quantity. Don't get lost in the noise - remember you're not alone, there are millions just like!

 

quality.... that was an easy one...

 

Quality links are best

 

I would prefer quality links, nice and slowly. Focus on great original content