Marine admits to killing 18 unarmed Iraqis, says he would do it again

Apparently not as pathetic as yours though, as you actually spend time worrying about my life.

Let that marinate a bit and get back to me

 

lol yeah, my 60 posts on this forum is same like his 9000!

 

Yup, I am sooooooooo worried about your phatetic life hahahahahahaha
So, whats your excuse? Flat fees?

 

You guys just have nothing on us, so you must resort to personal attacks. Now that's maturity...

I like how you side step the facts by starting other arguments...

 

Yes, you are worried about it, or you wouldn't have posted such. You're not ready for me. I'll make ya famous. Problem is, you're doing most of the work for me already.

 

Btw I should say something about theme of this thread while I am here.

In war time shit happens but also war crime happens and all war criminals should end up in jail for long time.
I hope we'll never seen something like My Lai massacre where war criminals got away with murdering woman and children.

 

Show me at least one f***king fact you provided!!!
I quoted all your posts and found nothing. If you consider something is fact because you said so than something is wrong with you seriously.

 

So it's flat feets right?

 

The argument: Who first brought up the question of Iraq's responsibility in 9/11

Now for the facts...

I first stated:

Let me interpret the context of this statement for you, since it seems you can't do it yourself: We are in the middle east because of the attacks on America.

Is Iraq mentioned? No. Is Iraq's responsibility mentioned? No.

Your post regarding the previous post states:

So, the first to even mention Iraq was you.

So, in regards to the argument: the facts are there, you brought up Iraq's responsiblity first.

Now sit down, shut up and get on with your pathetic life.

 

Ouch! zz, Walmart has new ass on sale this weekend. You might want to pick up a few spares

 

If he's not careful he will have to pick up a new screenname as well...spamming like that could get him banned...

 

refering to the original post - i wonder why someone would say he regrets doing something and in the same breath say he would do it again if the same situation presents itself. this double talk. tyipical of the west i might add.

 

So in other words you want to say that you attacked Iraq (or do you want to say that you attacked Middle east!?! ) because of 9/11 but when you were saying that you didn't mean that Iraq is responsible for that (and as I can see from this post you still mean that they aren't responsible for it!). Yeah, sounds logic.

 

I think what he is saying, is in retrospect he regrets taking innocent lives. But, if he where in the same combat situation where he is unsure who his enemies are he probablly would have made the same descision (unless he had information at the time to prove otherwise).

 

Again, where do I say we attacked Iraq? I showed you evidence... now show me some of yours. Where do I say "We attacked Iraq" or "Iraq is responsible for 9/11"? Hmmm? Better yet, where in my original post do I say that "We attacked the middle east"? You're reading into things... again...

You're quite the stubborn little DP'er

 

He said that he would do that again because that's his defence: he says he didn't do nothing wrong. If you didn't do nothing wrong of course you would do taht again, right?

 

So you didn't attacked Iraq?!? Ah yes! You were talking about Middle east! You attacked Middle east!
By saying "we are in middle east" you probably talked about your troops in Saudi Arabi or Kuwait. Sorry, my bad.

 

I think that the problem might simply be that your English skills are sub-par.

What he said makes perfect sense to me, but I'm a native English speaker.

I'm not sure how to translate something so simple and obvious for you.

 

You don't make much sense... But in either case... Please, using posts here in this thread, give me some evidence that proves that I brought up Iraq's involvment in 9/11, before you did

If you can't do it, just admit it. Quit feeding us "Iraq attacked you?!?!?!" statements with horrible grammar... they do nothing to feed the discussion.

 

Nope, you were talking about middle east and I first mentioned Iraq literaly, you got that right.
You only said that because of 9/11 you were in middle east (I dunno why you said middle east instead of Iraq but that's your right to do). So reason for being in middle east (Iraq for everyone else) is 9/11. Now, just tell me that you didn't said that or you didn't mean something like that. So, why did you attacked middle east? (Iraq for everyone else)