Manual website evaluation by G

Discussion in 'Google' started by av1, Mar 15, 2007.

  1. #1
    Today I received an interesting hit to one of my very well ranking websites with this referer information:https://www.google.com/evaluation/search/rating/task-edit?task=xxxxxxxx
    where x is a digit. They only visited the homepage (which ranks for a very competetive phrase usually in 1-2 spot in serps). Other info:
    IP: UNITED KINGDOM: 212.219.200.254
    Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)

    Anybody have any idea whats this?is google manually reviewing sites that rank well for competetive keywords and adjust them with human intervention?
     
    av1, Mar 15, 2007 IP
  2. grg

    grg Guest

    Messages:
    2,692
    Likes Received:
    73
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    Yep, you was investigated :)
     
    grg, Mar 15, 2007 IP
  3. qwestcommunications

    qwestcommunications Notable Member

    Messages:
    8,868
    Likes Received:
    172
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    233
    #3
    I remember they visited once quite a while back.It was from Mountain View, California.
     
    qwestcommunications, Mar 15, 2007 IP
  4. howard

    howard Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    59
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    123
    #4
    This is probably work done by Google's quality evaluation team. As I understand it, they employ a team of people with specialist knowledge in well-defined areas to review websites and give subjective scorings of how relevant a site is to a given query. These subjective scores are not used to make manual edits to the rankings - rather, they are used to build up a database of sites with carefully judged relevance scores for specific queries. This can be used by Google to evaluate possible improvements to their algorithm.

    Think about it - if G want to test 10 possible changes to the algorithm, how do they judge if any of the changes actually give better results overall? By doing automated scoring of all the results against a known database. This gives them scores for any alogorithm change in a completely automatic way, allowing them to see if improvements have been made or not. They need human input for the known database, so this is probably what the above visit was about.

    Howard
     
    howard, Mar 15, 2007 IP
  5. sachy24

    sachy24 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    605
    Likes Received:
    9
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    110
    #5
    i heard that google is employing university students at 10$/hr for manually evaluating your site
     
    sachy24, Mar 16, 2007 IP
  6. 8everything

    8everything Peon

    Messages:
    16,350
    Likes Received:
    903
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    That would be a good idea (bad news for black hat SEOers), good for use searchers!

    P.S: the link doesn't work for me:confused:

    Forbidden

    The user -------------- is not a member of EWOQ. Please ask your EWOQ contact for access.
     
    8everything, Mar 16, 2007 IP
  7. mvandemar

    mvandemar Notable Member

    Messages:
    2,409
    Likes Received:
    307
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #7
    Might also have been someone, perhaps a competitor, reported your site for spamming (regardless of whether or not you were), and someone was investigating.

    Whatever it is, it's new. Only one other reference about it out there that I can find, and it was also from this month:

    http://www.abakus-internet-marketing.de/foren/viewtopic/t-39080.html

    I don't read German, but looks like he's talking about the same thing you are.

    Edit: NM, found out more at SEORoundtable:

    http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/006791.html

    -Michael
     
    mvandemar, Mar 16, 2007 IP
  8. Mandrel

    Mandrel Peon

    Messages:
    29
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    Wow, this could be the sign of some big changes to how sites rank. Interesting.
     
    Mandrel, Mar 16, 2007 IP