Man charged for putting TV show on Web

Discussion in 'Legal Issues' started by browntwn, Jun 2, 2007.

  1. #1
    LOS ANGELES - Federal authorities have charged a Chicago man with copyright violations for allegedly uploading several episodes of Fox's "24" on the Internet before the show's season premiere earlier this year.

    Jorge Romero, 24, used a Web site to download the first four episodes of the sixth season of "24" and then uploaded them to LiveDigital.com, according to a federal complaint filed in Los Angeles on Friday.

    The episodes appeared online more than a week before their television debuts on Jan. 14 and 15. . . .

    more here


    . . . If convicted, Romero faces a maximum of three years in prison.
     
    browntwn, Jun 2, 2007 IP
  2. sundaybrew

    sundaybrew Numerati

    Messages:
    7,294
    Likes Received:
    1,260
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    560
    #2
    sundaybrew, Jun 2, 2007 IP
    Colleen likes this.
  3. browntwn

    browntwn Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    8,347
    Likes Received:
    848
    Best Answers:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    435
    #3
    Well it seems to me that they are going after the sources of the content, not the websites that host them.

    Even DailyMotion which hosted this content is not named, just the original uploader.

    It is clear to me, do not be the idiot who uploads copyright content. As far as posting it on your website after someone else uploads it - well I think that is fairly safe.
     
    browntwn, Jun 2, 2007 IP
  4. kingjacob

    kingjacob Peon

    Messages:
    905
    Likes Received:
    31
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    Why dont studios keep better track of their media? If the shows had yet to be shown how did they get on the internet? This is what I dont understand shows and movies always make it to the internet before they are released.
     
    kingjacob, Jun 2, 2007 IP
  5. inworx

    inworx Peon

    Messages:
    4,860
    Likes Received:
    201
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    inworx, Jun 3, 2007 IP
  6. tke71709

    tke71709 Peon

    Messages:
    536
    Likes Received:
    11
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    Three words...

    safe harbor provision
     
    tke71709, Jun 6, 2007 IP
  7. bobchrist

    bobchrist Active Member

    Messages:
    4,102
    Likes Received:
    95
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    88
    #7
    They should have asked him to remove it before bringing law suit.
     
    bobchrist, Jun 6, 2007 IP
  8. LegendaryPosting

    LegendaryPosting Peon

    Messages:
    711
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    most major websites like youtube and break have disclaimers stating that the user is responsible for what they upload not the owner of the site.
     
    LegendaryPosting, Jun 6, 2007 IP
  9. marketjunction

    marketjunction Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,779
    Likes Received:
    187
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    183
    #9
    No, they should not have sent a warning. That's why infringement is so out of control. All the idiots doing it think they'll get warned--then they'll stop.

    I say go after them hard out of the gate. No warnings, no notices and no prying. Just let them build up damages and hit them with everything you can.
     
    marketjunction, Jun 7, 2007 IP