no infractions huh? care to prove that with a screen shot? i know you have at least a warning infraction
Geez... Behave people! Calling others "idiots" and such really doesn't help a lot does it? And what about infractions? Mods and admins handle that, we've got nothing to do with this. Now I really suggest you start behaving...
I will provide a screen-shot of my profile - and your claims of knowing what I have and do not have are rather strange - as if you are TRYING to get me banned for no rule breakage I have ever participated in. img224.imageshack.us/img224/6536/screenga2.gif
Geez.... Thnk God that administrating some forums for quite some years gives me the patience for certain people... ah yes... age too!
I have attempted to keep my behavior absolutely in line with the rules set forth here. However I will defend my reputation, and not allow such vulgar slander to occur against me - but I will not resort to petty mud flinging, I will remain composed and respectful at all times. In addition I did not at all rip her in my second post, however I gave a counter argument to her in my thirteenth post upon these boards. Do a profile on me and go to the last page, count thirteen up - it should be there. My first post was my introduction and my second post was asking how people made so much money on their forums. I admit to lapses of knowledge and my thirst for it - as I do attempt to read most things in the business forums to gleam what ever I can to self educate upon the business of making money.
Seriously man, you need to relax. You'll die young. You posted in the P&R forums. If you do that, you will get flamed. Niccolo Machiavelli could post here and he would be flamed by someone who claimed that Old Nick didn't know anything about politics. Relax, being flamed doesn't hurt. Remember what they taught you in kindergarten? "Sticks and stones will break my bones, but words will never hurt me." PM Samantha and argue with her there if you want to continue that discussion.
yo jackass ooops typo i mean jackuul see the word slander, it has very little meaning here in the uk, you might pull that shit with other yanks to scare them. here in the UK i can Call you a Homo, a nut, and i can say just about as much as i want to say, the law here on slander is very different to that you have in the usa. slander on the NET is not the same in the uk as it is for TV and news papers, unless i was an editor of a newspapers website, then you can sue me for slander. i think you can go swollow the crap you try to dish out, and just accept the fact that someone dislikes you, personally. i'm sure i aint the 1st to dislike you.
Right you are! It just infuriates me that I had done nothing to warrant the remarks - I once administrated a game where I handled vulgarity on a daily basis, but when people levied insults there it was usually because of what was going on in the game (role playing site I might add) and not personal attacks without cause. I would think that old Machiavelli would have gotten himself on staff by his fifth post though
Oh no, you are not the first person to dislike me - however you are the first person to dislike me, and not use common sense in doing so. if you dislike me, have a good reason, have something I did wrong to you, have some kind of horrible absolutely vile crime I committed against you. When people dislike me they usually have a reason - and slander is slander. I was not threatening any form of litigation, but calling it by its ugly real name. Slander is by nature false or uninformed claims about someone in the attempts to ruin their reputation. I do not give a hill of beans that you dislike me, I do care that you continue to act like a child in your posts toward me, and you must be absolutely joking in your statement of me being a 13 year old, whilst you sit there and punch away at keys trying to think up more insults that would be heard on a school yard and not amongst rational people.
F1, Indie cars 500, GTA, role play, football, games dont interest me one little bit. keep your boy toys, and mind games. thats what you are best at. like i care, i'll just say my bit, it's the net and you cant hit me
The only games I play are writing based role-playing games. As in creating stories, my longest being around 32,000 words thus far.
i have a reason to dislike you, i dont have to disclose my reasons to you. the use of the word "slander" implies a threat in it own right, thats why people use the word. to damage your rep you have to have some 1st. here you have none. =1 you get that free for joining. though i dont think it will remain green that long, and i guess anyone that issues a red rep = negitive reputation, that is equal to slander too huh? look child, grow up and learn to chill and mix with the rest of the world. it will make life so much better for you in the long run. trying to prove you are better than anyone else, just makes you look the jackass you are.
He would have a legal responsibility to the child unless the woman was married to another man when she was implanted. As the child was his progeny, he would also have a moral responsibility to the child were he or she to be born. He didn't want that responsibility. In abortion, the reason that the man has no choice is because any action taken regarding the baby has a direct medical effect on the mother. To allow the man to decide for (or against) an abortion, or to force them to come to some form of agreement one way or another would allow him to have a direct medical impact on the mother. To allow someone to dictate the medical disposition of another human being against their conscious and spoken wishes is reprehensible. That's not present in this case.
So... what if the "morning after" pill worked for three months? What if there was an "instant abortion" pill?