oh really? 1. The terrorattacks in 9/11 is extremly hard to fake, if it isn't impossible. 2. The opposition in america is very strong today. As I said before, why didn't they blowed up a couple of remote controlled bombs on a regular basis instead and blame al-qaida? This is less costly and more effective in the long run.
And then what were they going to say while going to war? They bombed our restaurants and this is a war? Come on.
Hey, jackass, I am still waiting for a counter comment on the last post I made on page3. Oh please just say that it is false and give me a liberal-source
You can actually start with taking down empire state building and then bomb some restuarants then and then.
GTech is a proud person that can not accept the fact that he can be wrong. Its either his way or no way. It is pointless to make him open his mind to other possibilites as his mind is closed shut.
You made no counter comment. They rebuilt it and people were back in it in 2003 (2 years later)... big deal?
Yep, that's why I openly challenged three of you to pick your top four issues that support 9/11 was an inside job for a debate. And to date, only one took that challenge, yet you all have the advantage that your arguments come from others and requires little more effort than copying/pasting *their* argument as your own. The argument lacked any evidence proving molten steel existed, let alone that *anything* molten was tested to determine it was steel and not another metal. Surely this explains the deafening silence from the rest of you to bring your debate to the table. But not having facts to stand on, I can see why you would shy away. The offer is still open. Who's next?
Why don't you relize, that this conspiracy theory is created by people that would believe that BUSH is guilty wether he did it or not? Anyway, you have decided that bush is guilty just because the war against terrorism in Afganistan, right? I say that this wasn't Bush fault, nor was it Pentagon, FBI or CIA. What Bush did was the right thing. You can't just be a lameass and hope that the world will turn to a better place by itself when it's terribly sick.
lathorn when you find out exactly how many people were in it the day that "plane" crashed into it, you might have an argument. If you find out exactly how many people in that side of the pentagon died, you might have an argument... oh wait... both those statistics further my point
There's a compelling argument I bet zacharias moussaoui or his defense team never considered using Perhaps a memo to allah to put a hold on those 1,368 virgins that were erroneously awared is in order.
Hmm.. we'll try this your way then. Assuming you believe the "official" conspiracy, 19 men hijacked planes.... Wheres the proof? Did you have video tape or pictures of them hijacking it? Oh, well... I guess it's not proven then. No reason to continue any debate now. They used box cutters according to the story... do they have these box cutters now? Photographs? Oh, well... I guess it's not proven then. No reason to continue any debate now.
Reasons: 1. Divide and conquer (Julius Ceasar) 2. American governement is a business with shareholders that needs to make money and report earnings. Bush is a puppet CEO right now. 3. Fear is at the core of american society. Fear of loosing your job, not paying your rent, fear of getting sick or not being able to pay your bills on time. 4. Greed! There is so much more at the core of it all, but answers come only to those who question. If you have made up your mind and you believe everything that the government as an institution throws at you than I pitty you for you have become their slave in mind, spirit and soul. Another quick question GTech, why would you not question authority? Have you not seen all the wrongdoings that do happen in this country on a daily basis? Why is George Bush any different than say Nixon? Is he a smarter better man or you simply are more attracted to him?
On a related note, it's great to hear that internet usage beat watching TV for the first time here in the UK as the nation's favourite past time. It means rather than sheep just sucking up what the stupid networks serve up all day people actually get a better chance of watching documentaries like this - potentially true journalisms not controlled by those few with 'hidden' agenda's. Now if people actually read books more often as well, they'd have quite a different view on history as well as current affairs. And then after that, stick it to the conventional system!
Well, since you knew that the hitted section was empty, I suggest you to show a proof that confirms that the section was empty! And don't give me info from another freaky anti-republican site.
Like questioning why "molten steel" is assumed with no analysis? Or questioning the supposed "facts" of videos that are proven time and again to be not only inaccurate, but blatant lies, meant to convince young angry white males that something facts support, isn't reality? Sounds like a double standard in questioning. So you have no argument to present for debate? I can't say I didn't try. Perhaps the "fear" of being proven wrong, again, is too overwhelming.