Buying Looking for someone to write articles for me

If you can write decent articles, then get in touch. Details as follows:

1. Article between 400-500 words
2. Copyscape passed
3. Well researched
4. Delivered on time
5. Good communication

If you fit the above, then PM me your rates and sample of your work. If you don't include an example of your previous work in the PM, I won't bother.

S.

 

What's the budget? I know I fit the description but I may be to expensive.

 

What's the topic?

 

How many articles are you looking at per day/week?

 

Position filled, thanks for all replies.

 

payment received.

Thanks

 

No, because I did not use as a synonym for "also", which means "to expensive" is also correct.
This does not imply that using "too expensive" is wrong either, just that both versions are commonly used, and correct(Yes I checked)

Thank you for noticing though

 

I wouldn't normally point these things out, but I still think you're incorrect. While "to" has many uses, I don't think it can be used as a synonym to "too" in the above context. I had a look through the various uses of "to" here: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/to, and it would seem - according to that source, at least - that snowalker is correct. If you are right, though, I do apologise, but would love to see your source (since you said that you checked - simply to improve my own language of my native tongue!

Sorry for being a pain.

 

You were close but at the wrong section. Look up too and below the usage there's an added entry regarding awkward usage of too

 

I don't quite follow you here, Kraven2. I looked up "too" (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/too) and I can't find the added entry to which you are referring. The only "added entry" states as follows:

"Usage Note: Some language critics have objected to the use of not too as an equivalent of not very, as in She was not too pleased with the results. In many contexts this construction is entirely idiomatic and should pass without notice: It wasn't too long ago that deregulation was being hailed as the savior of the savings and loan industry. It was not too bright of them to build in an area where rock slides occur. In these cases not too adds a note of ironic understatement. · Negation of too by can't may sometimes lead to ambiguities, as in You can't check your child's temperature too often, which may mean either that the temperature should be checked only occasionally or that it should be checked as frequently as possible. · Too meaning "in addition" or "also" is sometimes used to introduce a sentence: There has been a cutback in federal subsidies. Too, rates have been increasing. There is nothing grammatically wrong with this usage, but some critics consider it awkward."

However, this entry does not state that "too" can be used as a synonym to "to" in the above mentioned context. Again, if I am missing something here please do put me right.

 

It might have been a typo but then again he said he was correct...

It should have been "too" instead of "to" in my opinion as well...

 

You don't have to take my word for it. Run it through a grammar checker right here

 

Sorry if I seem argumentative here, I don't mean to be a pain the the neck.

The grammar checker you linked to also accepts the following quote as being without fault:

"Them software on questions may is to expensive. I want too moves too chocolate."

Further, Microsoft Word 2007 does not accept "to" in the above context. And lastly, where on the dictionary.com definition of "too" did you find the exception which proved your point?

 

Kraven just accept your mistakes buddy. Open up Google search and type "to expensive". See the suggestion. Peace