joomla uses a lot of horsepower to load each page, you have to crunch like 4 megs of code for each page load. wordpress has all the structure already in the database that you would need to make a light weight cms. There's also a cms plugin for wordpress to enhance it a little bit. I'm really not a big fan of Joomla having used it and gutted the whole app by hand, although we did sell one joomla site for 8k
I`d like WordPress and Joomla same. Wordpress is only for blogs, but Joomla is for making any niche site.
Completly agree with you. joomla takes hell lot of resources to produces pages. People go with my words, start learning the drupal right now. And save yourself for the future. Take my advice and you'll be happy always. @smilingchopin I tried the early releases of Joomla 1.5 @me4you: Drupal has sharp learning curve than joomla. But I liked it as I learned because things were under my control and I could get whatever I want without touching any php code or installing new mods. With joomla I am restricted to category system and this thing I really dont like. There was a modules for multiple cats for j1.x bu didnt work well with legacy option.
What you understand SEO FRIENDLY? If URI, meta, speed - that many of CMS will approach. Personally it is pleasant to me to nobody known Rumba Easy, which is similar on CMSimple