Looking For Feedback

Discussion in 'HTML & Website Design' started by Nikita Popov, Jan 31, 2013.

  1. #1
    Nikita Popov, Jan 31, 2013 IP
  2. deathshadow

    deathshadow Acclaimed Member

    Messages:
    9,732
    Likes Received:
    1,999
    Best Answers:
    253
    Trophy Points:
    515
    #2
    The attempt at responsive layout is broken here in Opera mini and Chrome on my droid tablet, the fixed metric (px) fonts leave me diving for the zoom on my desktop... the inconsistent margins and paddings make most of the elements feel slapped on the page any old way, particularly in the header... and the dark grey on black menu is hard to read without hovering.

    Seems to take it's sweet time loading, most likely from the ungodly 20 javascripts totalling over half a megabyte for christmas only knows what. (Do I smell jQuery bloat before I even view source?) -- of course the EIGHT stylesheets totalling over 150K is mind-blowingly massive... what the devil are you doing that needs more CSS than the upper limit I would allow for the entire template for a site's HTML+CSS+SCRIPTS+IMAGES?!?

    Oh, bootstrap, that explains a LOT. Of course there's then the traditional endless STYLE inlined in the markup (bringing the massive external sheets even more into question), static scripting inlined in the markup, presentational images in the markup, the traditional HTML 5 bloat, endless pointless SECTION instead of the endless pointless DIV -- wonderful since SECTION is allegedly supposed to have a semantic meaning... multiple uses of the same ID, nonsensical gibberish use of heading tags, and general lack of anything resembling a sane document structure or semantic markup.

    Not exactly a surprise it's 20k of markup for 1k of plaintext -- likely two or even three times as much code as should be neccessary on such a simple layout.

    It's 883k in 41 files to deliver 1k of plaintext, two content images and five presentational images... Not counting the 'slid.png' there's no legitimate excuse for that entire page to take more than 70k in a dozen or less files.

    Oh, and that wierd fixed line at the bottom that doesn't quite line up with the window and overlaps the footer text -- not sure what you're intent was with that.
     
    deathshadow, Jan 31, 2013 IP
  3. Alam

    Alam Active Member

    Messages:
    316
    Likes Received:
    91
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    68
    #3
    I have visited your site. At a glance well, but missing attractive footer. need SEO friendly title for every page.
    Best of luck.
     
    Alam, Feb 1, 2013 IP