1. Advertising
    y u no do it?

    Advertising (learn more)

    Advertise virtually anything here, with CPM banner ads, CPM email ads and CPC contextual links. You can target relevant areas of the site and show ads based on geographical location of the user if you wish.

    Starts at just $1 per CPM or $0.10 per CPC.

Looking for feedback to improve user testing and usability platform

Discussion in 'Reviews' started by Tade, Feb 3, 2020.

0
  1. #1
    Hi everyone!
    I am working on the development of online user testing and usability platform to help web and UX designers, UX researchers and Front end testers. We are looking for feedback from web designers that is why I am posting here. If you tried it out and gave us some opinions you would be very helpful. Please register HERE .
    We will also activate full access for 30 days free if you email what mail you used to register at so you can improve your web design and help us too.
     
    Tade, Feb 3, 2020 IP
  2. deathshadow

    deathshadow Acclaimed Member

    Messages:
    9,732
    Likes Received:
    1,998
    Best Answers:
    253
    Trophy Points:
    515
    #2
    Since you're too new to post real links it's hard to say for sure, but if it's the domain in the e-mail you posted, once again we have people talking about UX who don't know enough about accessibility to be flapping their yap about it.

    See the illegible colour contrasts far below WCAG minimums, pissing on accessibility with PX metric font-sizes, broken willy-nilly mix of PX and dynamic metrics and broken responsiveness... and that's before we pop the bonnet to talk about the utter and complete developer incompetence of static style in the markup, little to nothing remotely resembling semantics, endless pointless DIV for nothing, endless pointless classes for nothing, presentational use of classes meaning whoever made the site should just go back to using that HTML 3.2 they so clearly miss, etc, etc.

    Hence a reek of ignorance, incompetence, and ineptitude as proven by the 325k of markup being delivered for 2.41k of plaintext and not a single actual CONTENT image -- aka not even 8k of HTML's flipping job! Mate that to the batshit nutters 4.44mb of scripttardery spanning 140 files (and the resultant 40 second page-load time here thanks to handshaking hell), and pretty much you REALLY should learn something about ACTUAL DESIGN and development before making some sort of "tool" to analyze sites on the topic.

    Though quality job packing lighthouse and pingdom full of manure so they can't figure out what your real page load time is. Getting a wee bit tired of seeing that sleazy dirtbag trick.
     
    deathshadow, Feb 10, 2020 IP