links are kING or is content King?

Yeah, show me that you know to do better, istead of talking about something you seem not to know a lot about, then providing off theme arguments to defend your position. There is nothing wrong about an opinion but you should provide some arguments I haven't seen from you until now here.

 

I've already clearly demonstrated that I know more about the subject than you do.

When I said that no one will ever see your great content if you don't have good backlinks, and you provided your fourth position on a low volume, no competition SERP as an example that people would see good content with no backlinks, that was a clear demonstration that you haven't the foggest notion of what SEO is all about.

Anyone can get to the first page in google. That doesn't mean that anyone will ever see that page except you.

 

This is rediculess, you still refuse to keep your arguments related to the question of this thread here - do whatever you want but stop wasting forum members time with OFF THEME talks. May be we should start to talk about the weather?

 

I have not posted a single post in this thread that is off topic.

I even summarized the entire thread for you very neatly. Again (for those that have a difficult time comprehending), the thread is about which is more important, content or backlinks.

My contention is that both are equally important. You can have great content, but no one will ever see it without good backlinks.

Then you jump in and said that you rank 4th on a SERP with no backlinks. But that doens't have anything to do with this thread. Placing 4th on a SERP that no one ever sees DOES NOT prove that anyone will ever see your good (in your opinion) content. Thus, your argument is not only irrelevant, but it's also completely invalid.

And so, the conclusion is, both are equally important. You can have great content, but no one will ever see it without good backlinks.