Link building Fast or Slow, which one.

Basically, if we build all of your links at once, or too fast, Google senses this as spam. Google will therefore penalize your site in the rankings. While there is no set rule about how quickly or how many links you can get, it's wise to limit you inbound links to about a dozen or so per day.

 

ya you are right. Fast link building will treat as spam.

 

Can I add a third option? Consistently.

Whether you choose fast or slow, you need to be consistent with your efforts.

It is no good getting 1000's one week, then not bothering getting any other links for months.

 

That sounds about right for a brand new site. For an aged domain, that number is way conservative IMHO.

Pierre.

 

if your website is new 10-25 links daily can be good for you.

 

you can make 20 - 25 links per day.. too fast link building report u as spam.. so go slowly will help you always..

 

yes i m agree with u jannyflcn we can make 20 to 25 link daily. it's good for site....

 

The exact volume or quantity of links you generate is not the issue. It is the consistency and size of your site that matters.

If you start out generating 1000 links a day and you keep to that consistently and you are a fairly big site then that is o.k. But if you are a very small site and attempt to generate that, then it may be counted as spamming.

For a big site, if you now attempt to generate a million backlinks in a day and nothing for quite sometime, then you may be liable for links spamming.

 

It also depends on the quality of the websites you're building the links on. If you build a crazy amount of links in low traffic sites you'll be flagged as a spammer in no time.

 

I don't think search engine will do penalty for fast link building.

 

Build links in an unique frequency.

 

well if you can balance it then the result will be great. if you do fast the quality might suffer. if you do it slowly but surely yes you will get a very good quality links but when do you think your site be on the top of google search?

 

Slow link building is the better option

 

Just playing devil's advocate: Doesn't consistency look spammy? What Google really wants is a site that is gaining backlinks organically, from humans discussing the site and passing it on. This growth wouldn't happen robotically, with the same number of backlinks being added daily. There would be surges and there would be slow days, and the backlinks would come from the same place on some days and from all over the place on other days. It seems a bit of randomness would be best. I do agree though that getting a massive amount of backlinks to start off with and then not getting any will get flagged as owner-generated links and may be penalized.

 

Hi,

In my own experiences, it might be no speed issue on back link building. If you could increase your back links in a constant pace, it would be OK.

have a nice day,

 

It's the consistency that makes the biggest difference.

Best Wishes

 

Fast link building will bad for any website so link building should be done on slow process.

 

i can't agree with that, fast link building might get yo uin the sandbox, but at the long term it doesnt matter. Links and traffic tend to develop naturally due the law of attracting, wether it is fast or slow: Crap gets deleted/punished, Quality and value gets attention