Liberal Judge Makes Intercepting Enemy Communications ILLEGAL

Dude, you shouldn't joke about having grenades in your luggage! Especially at an airport! That's stupidity on his part, and your post is really off topic from the thread

We take terrorism seriously, unlike you and your friends.

 

Notice I included the word distasteful. Maybe you'll learn that one in class one of these days and understand what I said.

So seriously you're now locking up senior citizens who tell jokes. That certainly isn't reminding me of a Nazi-like country at all

 

That federal protocol, yo-yo. FAA shit.

The prosecutor will most likely find no reason to press charges (after reviewing the circumstance) or perhaps they'll slap him on the wrist with some community service. You can't do that shit at an airport, no matter the excuse.

 

How about murdering 1.2 million babies? Does that ring a nazi bell?

 

There's no excuse for locking up senior citizens for telling distasteful jokes.

 

Find a definition (from a well known dictionary) that claims the word baby means fetuses and embryos. Sorry, your misinformation and propaganda only works on the ignorant and impressionable. Seems you've already rubbed off on the middle schooler, congrats buddy - he's sounding more like you every day.

 

There's always a reason to enforce the law, no matter who you are or how old you are. If you break the law, you pay the consequence. Age doesn't excuse someone who murders, nor should it excuse someone who "jokes" about terrorist activities in airports.

Remember, not everyone wants terrrorists to succeed. There are exceptions to that rule though, right?

 

So just to make it clear, you're in favor of locking up people for telling jokes now? Man... what the red army wouldn't have given for more guys like you!

 

I've already defined "life" in another thread. The absence of a heartbeat is death. The presence of a heartbeat is life. Life begins with a heartbeat. A baby's first heartbeat takes place during the fifth week.

Congrats, you've finally admitted you and hitler have something in common

 

You are in favor of not locking people up for breaking the law? There are laws in place about discussing such things in the open, in airports. Just because you don't agree with the law, and want terrorists to succeed, doesn't mean the law is any less of a law.

You don't shout fire in a crowded theater, you don't make jokes about having explosive devices in airports. Having a tough time with that, eh?

 

Gtech I'm not talking about life. I'm talking about your faulty use of the word "babies"... fetuses and embryos are not babies. You know this is true and that's why you can't produce the definition (compuxp backed out of it as well).

Oh well... even with your lies pointed out and blatantly obvious, the young impressionable minds of 15 year olds will still listen and repeat

 

Depends on the law. I'm against sending anyone to prison for victimless crimes. Especially if they were simply using their right to free speech and telling someone what they thought to be a funny joke.

So now old men telling bad jokes is some how related to wanting the terrorists to win? Care to expand on that one

 

A baby's life begins with a heartbeat at five weeks. You are in favor of killing 1.2 million per year. That says a lot about you. I'm sure you are able to convince yourself murdering babies is honorable.

If you are ashamed of supporting the murder of 1.2 million babies per year, stop supporting the murder of 1.2 million per year. Or stand up and be a proud baby killer.

 

So the law applies to some, but not to others? If I do, hell, lock him up...but if the old man does it,...well, fuck, he's not a bad guy, just let him act that way.

Not enforcing a rather reasonable law against those cognitive enough to understand it, is like saying the law is meanless. Thus the image before the supreme court...a lady eyes are closed from bias (not that it always works that way).

That's the problem with immigration laws, and many other laws...you can't allow bias perspecives to destroy the full consequences of those laws. If you can't realize the language of the law is wrong by enforcing a faultly one or a good law, then you don't know what works.

 

You do not have the right to express free speech in an airport regarding explosive devices. I invite you to visit your local airport and openly joke about explosive devices. Let me know how it works out

I don't think they are in any way related to your desire for terrorists to win. But I enjoyed pointing it out

 

See this post http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=1305178&postcount=152

I'm not in favor of locking up anyone for telling a bad joke. If it was meant to be percieved as a real threat or even threatening rather than funny - then that's different.

And yes, the law applies to some and not to others. How about if a 6 year old said the same joke? You want the law to apply to everyone the same ricky? There's a difference in people who have the mental capacity to understand their actions.

 

Why is that not surprising. I wonder what conservative we have to thank for that one.

 

A six year old isn't in question. An older man, who does know better is. Fortunately, you are on the wrong side, yet again, as whether you agree or not, the system works and it didn't discriminate.

 

Free-Speech doesn't mean you have the 'right' to say anything anywhere. School adminstrations have specific powers to adminstrate what can or can't be said in a class (because they are deemed to be regulated controllers of public or private property). Same with private property...say your on mine, and I don't like what your speaking about...I can kick you out. Free-Speech has it's rational limits.

FAA has federal authority over anything that involves flight safety, and thus they have the reasonable authority to dicate what can or can't be said in their territory. You can dispute this, but you would have to change a few Supreme court decesions concern the breadth of what free speech is.

On a side note, I don't like the federal organization that regulate speech/behaviour on tv or radio.

 

http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache...+explosives"+airport&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=4

Seems to go back a very, very long ways.