LHC didn't destroy us all :)

Discussion in 'General Chat' started by Silver89, Sep 10, 2008.

  1. #1
    Silver89, Sep 10, 2008 IP
  2. !Unreal

    !Unreal Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,671
    Likes Received:
    27
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    165
    #2
    Rofl...well now I know...
     
    !Unreal, Sep 10, 2008 IP
  3. dulcificum

    dulcificum Active Member

    Messages:
    535
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    68
    #3
    Give it a month or so for the proper collisions...
     
    dulcificum, Sep 10, 2008 IP
  4. spinx

    spinx Banned

    Messages:
    63
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    I already thought so..
     
    spinx, Sep 10, 2008 IP
  5. surelacard

    surelacard Peon

    Messages:
    31
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    what a relief... not really but that gave me a good chuckle. "NO."
     
    surelacard, Sep 10, 2008 IP
  6. dulcificum

    dulcificum Active Member

    Messages:
    535
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    68
    #6
    Have you seen the HTML comments?
     
    dulcificum, Sep 10, 2008 IP
  7. Agent_Dweeb

    Agent_Dweeb Peon

    Messages:
    5,607
    Likes Received:
    384
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    
    <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
    <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <head>
      <title>Has the Large Hadron Collider destroyed the earth yet?</title>
      <!--
    this is the fault of daniel drucker dmd@3e.org
    
     the first person to ask for an RSS feed gets a free black hole in their junk 
    you are too late, people have already asked. ok fine i made one. rss.xml.
    -->
    
    <link rel="alternate" title="Has the Large Hadron Collider destroyed the earth yet?" href="http://www.hasthelhcdestroyedtheearth.com/rss.xml" type="application/rss+xml" />
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
    </head>
    
    <body style="text-align: center; padding-top: 200px;">
    <!-- oh shit bears --> 
    
    <!--
    [ddrucker@scatter ~]$ host -t txt freon.3e.org
    freon.3e.org descriptive text "Anesthetized monkeys exposed to 25,000
    ppm or 50,000 ppm [of freon] for 5 minutes had [cardiac] [arrhythmia]s
    including [tachycardia] and decreased contractility (U.S. EPA 1983)"
    
    
    In their paper, Coleman and de Luccia noted:
    
        The possibility that we are living in a false vacuum has never
    been a cheering one to contemplate. Vacuum decay is the ultimate
    ecological catastrophe; in the new vacuum there are new constants of
    nature; after vacuum decay, not only is life as we know it impossible,
    so is chemistry as we know it. However, one could always draw stoic
    comfort from the possibility that perhaps in the course of time the
    new vacuum would sustain, if not life as we know it, at least some
    structures capable of knowing joy. This possibility has now been
    eliminated.
        The second special case ... applies if we are now living in the
    debris of a false vacuum ... This case presents us with less
    interesting physics and with fewer occasions for rhetorical excess
    than the preceding one.
    	
    S. Coleman and F. De Luccia (1980). "Gravitational effects on and of vacuum decay". Physical Review D21: 3305.
    
    
    the crab always wins; it makes the baby syntacticians cry.
    
    -->
    
      <span style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 120pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; text-decoration: none; color: black;"  >NO</span>
    <br />
    <br />
    <br />
    <br />
    <br />
    <br /><!-- this is valid xhtml, biotechs -->
    <br />
    <br />
    <br />
    <br />
    <!-- ok i have succumbed to the siren call of adding useful information to this page, here is Seed Magazine's coverage of the LHC -->
    <a href="http://www.seedmagazine.com/news/2008/09/large_and_in_charge.php" style="font-weight: light; font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; text-decoration: none; color: #999999;"  >?</a>
    
    <script type="text/javascript">
    var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www.");
    document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
    </script>
    <script type="text/javascript">
    var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-143825-2");
    pageTracker._trackPageview();
    </script>
    </body>
    </html>
    
    
    Code (markup):
    Read those comments.
     
    Agent_Dweeb, Sep 10, 2008 IP
  8. Silver89

    Silver89 Notable Member

    Messages:
    2,243
    Likes Received:
    72
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    #8
    I don't understand the comments.
     
    Silver89, Sep 10, 2008 IP
  9. Hopper

    Hopper Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,330
    Likes Received:
    96
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #9
    Remember, they only sent one beam in one direction today, they have yet to send one in the opposite direction as well as engineer a collision, it could take up to 1 year for this to happen.

    So the world could still end but in anytime from now to a year ;) :eek: ;) :eek:
     
    Hopper, Sep 10, 2008 IP
  10. Silver89

    Silver89 Notable Member

    Messages:
    2,243
    Likes Received:
    72
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    205
    #10
    Sounds good to me :)
     
    Silver89, Sep 10, 2008 IP
  11. LeoSeo

    LeoSeo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,647
    Likes Received:
    56
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    125
    #11
    I heard something on the news like the high energy collisions are planned to take place on 21th of Oct. and this was just a test for it... which means we are not safe yet :X lol
     
    LeoSeo, Sep 10, 2008 IP
  12. dynashox

    dynashox Premium Member Staff

    Messages:
    8,662
    Likes Received:
    563
    Best Answers:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    335
    #12
    Lol.... I guess all of us already know the answer to that question.
     
    dynashox, Sep 10, 2008 IP
  13. yupyup

    yupyup Peon

    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #13
    `hahaha thats funny
     
    yupyup, Sep 10, 2008 IP
  14. NsaneNoob

    NsaneNoob Peon

    Messages:
    2,103
    Likes Received:
    59
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #14
    Of course it didn't and it won't. But in the experiment there was only one beam that almost achieved speed of light. In the next experiment, which will be in a month, October, they will try to hit 2 particles together and thats where the sh1t happens.
     
    NsaneNoob, Sep 10, 2008 IP
  15. deepak_sharma

    deepak_sharma Banned

    Messages:
    260
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #15
    hmm.
    gr8.
    but i already know about this
     
    deepak_sharma, Sep 10, 2008 IP
  16. Cheap SEO Services

    Cheap SEO Services <------DoFollow Backlinks

    Messages:
    16,664
    Likes Received:
    1,318
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #16
    How's that Brian Cox dude as the spokesperson!!! He used to be in a rock band and also in a 80's/90's band called D-Ream. He's a funny guy for a nerdy scientist.
     
    Cheap SEO Services, Sep 10, 2008 IP