Keyword spamming urls in domain

Discussion in 'Search Engine Optimization' started by thomasram, Nov 3, 2008.

  1. #1
    Hi,

    I have come across a site which creates several pages for same concept with various keywords.

    Suppose villas is the keyword they have created different pages for

    1. villas
    2.villa
    3.villas for sale
    4.villa for sale
    5.villas in area
    5.villas in the area and more. Each and every keyword they created a single page.

    is it not sort of spam? how these pages will be looked by search engines?

    Regards,
    thomas ram
     
    thomasram, Nov 3, 2008 IP
  2. Scar

    Scar Peon

    Messages:
    439
    Likes Received:
    8
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    sweet name
     
    Scar, Nov 3, 2008 IP
  3. rena

    rena Peon

    Messages:
    1,987
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    Its will not be a problem . but distribution its should be in natural way. Don't add as a list, try to include with content
     
    rena, Nov 4, 2008 IP
  4. cnvseo

    cnvseo Guest

    Messages:
    355
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    I think it depends upon structure and content of each page. If that tool is not using effective content that we manually do than there is no meaning of using this tool. If the tool is delivering unique content than there is no problem, and please share that tool with us LOL ;)
     
    cnvseo, Nov 4, 2008 IP
  5. SEOBackup - JIM

    SEOBackup - JIM Banned

    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    Also worth noting: The User

    Will endless reams of pages with virtually the same content affect the user experience? I would suggest 1 main page (Villa/Villas), 1 Villas for sale page, and 1 main page for the areas (then use that page to link to area specific pages). This is more natural for both the user & the search engine :)
     
    SEOBackup - JIM, Nov 4, 2008 IP