Just want a review on what I have done so far

Loaded some files I have been working for my website http://www.realtytocell.com/ even though I am still working on the backend. I a want to get a feel for how people see what it is now while I still have time to change things before launch. All opinions good or bad will be welcome. one thing I do know and am looking to do now is hire a profreader to check spelling and grammar.

 

is it that bad???

 

you should get some adsense on there

 

hmmm... do you really think that would be welcome on a service site like this

 

Still alot of work required.It loads too late.

 

Your content is certainly coming along nicely; but for some reason, when first viewing the page my eyes don't know where to look, they are just flicking around the page looking for a starting point (everything is similar in size and there seem to be too many potential focus points). I feel that your design need to lead the viewer to where you want them to start, right now there are any number of headings I could start from; attract visitors to/with your main heading and make reading the page from this point logical and familiar

 

Its actually not Looking Good , Analysis are the best Way to Describe your Work do Mention in the Points and make it links on sub categories.
Customize more and if i say so then actually i will never read the full Long Lengthy introduction (Page).

 

Looks like a good start. The page loaded fine for me. I agree the intro page could be more focused and shorter. I don't know if it's the color scheme or font but it seemed somewhat fuzzy.

 

Absurdly undersized fixed metric fonts mean large font/120 dpi users are diving for the zoom the moment they land on your page. Your stencil font is a bit blurry and hard to read, and I see no graceful degredation for images off.

My reviews always touch on the codebase - and my advice is to throw it out. 19 tables on a layout that even USING tables for layout shouldn't need more than one... That's bad. Presentational markup without even the ATTEMPT at using CSS - that's bad. Relative lack of anything resembling semantic markup - very bad. Improper use of heading tags - even worse. Yet another case of "there's more of 1998 to this site than 2008"

 

Looks Gud!

 

not bad, 7/10 from me

 

I thougt the main content too wide. maybe you can add 1 coloum again at the right side. Image logo is too small.

Just my opinion

 

thanks had a bad feeling after reading the review from that fellow with the rooster logo running around the review section with a chip on his shoulder

 

Logo wording needs to be larger. Text almost overwhelming because it's so much to read.