Are they really that bad, and that difficult to get high SERP's with? If you found a decent 2-word keyword available in .WS, would you even bother with it?
Yes, they are a crap ccTLD with very limited resale value. From an SEO perspective, any extention will be treated equally
Man, I stick with the top 3 .com, .net, .org tlds as much as possible. People remember them most. As for purposes of SE indexing, they (.ws, .cc, .name, .info, etc.) weigh in equally just like any other TLD.
good points. I'm finding domain registration to be extremely frustrating. EVERYthing seems to have been taken. All 3-keyword .com's, .net's and .infos...and I don't want to start researching 4-word domain names...
the acrediting company prices by supply and demand like some sports and concert tickets.1 letter domains cost more than2 letter etc.then they revert to standard price after 4 lettershttp://www.website.ws/faq/pricing.dhtmlfor $50,000 you can have you own 1 letter domain.Minght be worth it if you live long enough.Go Samoa!
.us is not the 3rd best one. com, net, co.uk & de are stronger than .us, I would even say that .org is also stronger as well
Personally, I'd NEVER get one. I will always get a .com, and if the name I want isn't available in .com, I will just think of another name. That's my opinion.