July 27th Indexed pages Decrease

Discussion in 'SEO' started by INV, Jul 27, 2006.

  1. INV

    INV Peon

    Messages:
    1,686
    Likes Received:
    101
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #41
    Everything is back to normal with the Indexed pages issue for me.
     
    INV, Aug 1, 2006 IP
  2. NetMidWest

    NetMidWest Peon

    Messages:
    1,677
    Likes Received:
    151
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #42
    http://72.14.207.104/ still shows low numbers for me.

    INV, does your domain contain any hyphens?

    This could just be the same old problem revisited, on some d/c's. There was a problem with hyphenated domains about the time I launched this site... but I thought it was fixed.
     
    NetMidWest, Aug 2, 2006 IP
    INV likes this.
  3. INV

    INV Peon

    Messages:
    1,686
    Likes Received:
    101
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #43
    http://72.14.207.104 is still a problem. However, the other ones are back to normal. I am still not sure whats the deal on this dc and what tests are being run.

    I dont have any Hyphens. Just to clear that up.
     
    INV, Aug 2, 2006 IP
  4. Henny

    Henny Peon

    Messages:
    2,118
    Likes Received:
    241
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #44
    Which DC is looking normal to you?
     
    Henny, Aug 2, 2006 IP
  5. INV

    INV Peon

    Messages:
    1,686
    Likes Received:
    101
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #45
    INV, Aug 2, 2006 IP
  6. NetMidWest

    NetMidWest Peon

    Messages:
    1,677
    Likes Received:
    151
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #46
    The decreased number d/c's may very well be correct for site: searches...
    http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=118261 discusses a site that is pretty new, and is a good one to study across d/c's.
    You can tell if you are using one of these d/c's if the main page comes up first in the results for a site: search.

    But if we accept those d/c's as good, there are either a bunch of pages missing from the site:search or allinurl: is broken... and it may well be the latter.
     
    NetMidWest, Aug 3, 2006 IP
  7. NetMidWest

    NetMidWest Peon

    Messages:
    1,677
    Likes Received:
    151
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #47
    About 60 seconds into this video:
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3494613828170903728
    Matt Cutts mentions two changes to site: command that will make the count more accurate.

    I guess that is what we are looking at, some kind of fix.
    I hope the site: database is just smaller for now, and the actual number of indexed pages is closer to an allinurl: search...
     
    NetMidWest, Aug 3, 2006 IP
  8. INV

    INV Peon

    Messages:
    1,686
    Likes Received:
    101
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #48
    INV, Aug 3, 2006 IP
  9. NetMidWest

    NetMidWest Peon

    Messages:
    1,677
    Likes Received:
    151
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #49
    I think they are out to make fools of us, INV. http://216.239.57.99/ is now part of the first set... It is definitely spreading.
     
    NetMidWest, Aug 3, 2006 IP
  10. Henny

    Henny Peon

    Messages:
    2,118
    Likes Received:
    241
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #50
    Mine are still gone on all the DC's, down to 3900...
     
    Henny, Aug 3, 2006 IP
  11. ascensions

    ascensions Active Member

    Messages:
    175
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    58
    #51
    I definately hope this thing isn't over yet. But Cutts seems pretty sure of himself when he suggest that it might be over-optimization causing it. Funny thing is, a couple seconds ago, google couldn't find mattcutts.com....when I tried. How ironic is that?
     
    ascensions, Aug 3, 2006 IP
  12. KLB

    KLB Peon

    Messages:
    1,167
    Likes Received:
    68
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #52
    This would be a perfect way to get the folks at Google to listen that something don't smell right with the latest updates. Has someone thought of using their coop weight to promote Matt's site? (bad Ken, such evil thoughts :eek:)
     
    KLB, Aug 3, 2006 IP
  13. INV

    INV Peon

    Messages:
    1,686
    Likes Received:
    101
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #53
    Your right. It seems it joined the dark side. Just I thought I would mention this happened to all the larger websites I have. I dont use the co-op, I also dont over optimise and know the limits to keep it completly clean.

    I am hoping its tweaking or something because this isnt a correct way google is display results, google just messed up its not the websites.

    I dont even listen to Matt Cutt's because most of the things he says are washed up. He blends the real truth of what does work with what google wishes you would do.

     
    INV, Aug 3, 2006 IP
  14. ascensions

    ascensions Active Member

    Messages:
    175
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    58
    #54
    It's one thing if Google is just changing things around, it's a whole another thing when they blame us for it. That's misdirection, and that's evil.
     

    Attached Files:

    ascensions, Aug 3, 2006 IP
  15. LoriVa

    LoriVa Peon

    Messages:
    119
    Likes Received:
    8
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #55
    ascensions

    I did this accidentally one day site:domain (without the .com) and realized it's a great way to find scrapers. It will list everyone using your domain (scrapers often don't link to your site so you can't find them with inurl).

    I found one that had the domain (without the dot com) in a header tag pretending to be another site.

    It will also bring up sites with your domain on other tlds, i.e., yourdomain.net, yourdomain.uk etc.

    It also brings up sites with your title in their title which can be very damaging depending on how many pages they do this on or if they repeat it on the page too many times, as they are now competiting with your main keywords.

    Check carefully any site ranking above your own site in this search.
     
    LoriVa, Aug 4, 2006 IP
  16. INV

    INV Peon

    Messages:
    1,686
    Likes Received:
    101
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #56
    As of yesterday. It seems almost all except a few datacenters switched to the new garbage system.
     
    INV, Aug 12, 2006 IP
  17. INV

    INV Peon

    Messages:
    1,686
    Likes Received:
    101
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #57
    INV, Aug 13, 2006 IP
  18. Ned

    Ned Active Member

    Messages:
    402
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    78
    #58
    I'm not sure whats happened to my site.

    The number of indexed pages in the API has crashed from 105,000 to 1

    When doing a site:domain.ext query it returns 105,000 indexed pages, the same number the API used to report. However the indexed pages in the API have now dropped to 1.

    Any ideas whats happened?

    I did have an error in my google sitemap (I deleted it by accident and it failed loading) and wondered if this caused the cockup with API indexed pages.

    I am not 100% sure when this all happened, but it was only noticed in the last few days.
     
    Ned, Aug 14, 2006 IP
  19. Ned

    Ned Active Member

    Messages:
    402
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    78
    #59
    Just used a datacenter checker, and it appears most datacenters now show 105k indexed but most are supplemental. Only 6 proper pages are shown in the results.

    However it seems now that all of the indexed results have a cache date of Auguest 2005 so are a year old. :/
     
    Ned, Aug 14, 2006 IP
  20. Henny

    Henny Peon

    Messages:
    2,118
    Likes Received:
    241
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #60
    I give up, until google gives up the crack.
     
    Henny, Aug 14, 2006 IP