juice or table? which is better for SEO?

Hi guys,

Does any one can give me some advice? Which layout is bettery? the juice or the table?

Is the talbe called frame?

Thanks

 

lol, SEO on the juice. Yep steroids will get your site ranking quickly.

 

Huh!

Is it just me, or does anyone else not have a clue what is being asked here?

 

You could tell I had no idea what they were asking?

 

i dont have any idea what you are talking about

 

Are you talking about the coding aspect of a page i.e table and table less design, iframes etc. ?

 

Do you have query on which design if better (table less (div) vs table) for site layout?

 

many SEOers said :"avoid the frame", but why?

Do I need to change the table layout to juice?

That's exactly what I mean.

I have a website which is built up by the pure tables, is that is OK for SEO?

 

Look at the source code when using frames. The search engine bot does not read the text on the page.

 

Tables are OK but tables less(div) are better. Clean and lighter code to allow faster page loading and facilitate better indexing. This does however not mean that table design are not SEO compliant.

The reason Iframes are not advisable is that search engine crawlers trip on iframes, cannot read anything contained in it. The Iframe is used to display stuff from a different source. Another reason; though the content of the page contained in Iframe changes, the url remains the same, the same problem as in having a AJAX based website. I can't thing of an example, I will look for one and post it if I find it.

 

my question is

ex: if site shows their inner pages in home page code, but apparently inner page can be opened in browser separately, is it possible to get indexed this inner pages in SERP, or give them link juice to get high pr, in fact they are shown Normally in home page .

 

I don't know if I got you right. Please correct me if I am wrong.

What you are trying to say is that there is a link for a inner page on your home page. If your click on that link, the page opens in a new window. If this be the case, I don't see a reason why search engine crawlers would not be able to index the inner page.

 

i was asking abt iframed inner pages and their influence in serp

 

Yes, table is absolutely okay for SEO - as for iframe, it gains PR as any other web pages but the problem with iframe is that it makes the page very hard to link to and thus, not recommended for SEO.

On the other hand, why would you burry a page in another page's frame since you wish it to rank in SE?

 

Mahendra, I think you have an answer now. Also (as I have said before), a page retrieved via an iframe is new content but the url remains the same. Suppose I have a page contained in an iframe. It may have different sections and by clicking on them the content of the page changes, but the url in the address bar remains the same. So effectively the search engines have on one url to associate with all the content. That is not healthy from an SEO point of view.

 

i m not satisfied with your comment that url remains same if a site have framed page,

take a look at one example

there r two pages, one is product main page - http://xlecom.com/demos/demo-m/index.html

and

second is framed page implemented in product main page - http://xlecom.com/demos/demo-m/html/page_014.html

second page existed in main page , it has different url and it can be indexed in search index and can get pr.

if someone click on the framed page, the page can get traffic, link juice and the page wil be in search results,

it doesnt mean that this framed url is not counted in link juice,

i beg your pardon

 

i haven’t got any suggestion of my said question

 

What exactly you want to know?

Are you opening the inner page in a new window using target=_blank (in that case the link juice will pass) or are you using an iframe to open your inner page? (in case of iframe you won't get the seo benefit)

 

see my third last thread to get examples