Sorry to start up this thread again, how weather changing causes political hate is beyond me at times. Here is new information to help target possible causes of global warming. http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/new..._RTRIDST_0_SCIENCE-ENVIRONMENT-METHANE-DC.XML Personally I've taken the challenge to reduce the threat by rolling up certain ones in paper and smoke-em'. Enjoy, Tom
I think I mentioned in this thread (early on) ---- GW = NATURAL OCCURENCE. To answer your question though on why it leads to political hate? Because liberals are a mean nasty bunch of spoiled children that can get mad at anything any time, for any reason. They think that Bush invented global warming, just like Al Gore invented the internet. Anything that goes wrong with the planet, must be our fault, because along with being a mean nasty bunch of spoiled children, liberals also have a guilt complex that makes herion addiction look like a safer alternative. Anyway, I am gonna do my part today and kill some plants. The neighbors bush has been an eye sore for years. Its toast now. Save the Planet man, KILL A PLANT!!!
I posted this in another thread a few months back. NY Times even had a similar story a few weeks ago. Cleaner air in the past decade is contributing to global warming. If pollution is the cause of global warming; how can the removal of it make it worse? I think man-made global warming is bunk. I think its a natural phenomenon caused by outside forces that scientists simply do not understand. The earth is cooler now than it was 1000 years ago. Spots are warmer, spots are cooler. Global warming and cooling has been going on for eons. There was a mini ice age in the 13th or 14th century as well. It goes up and it goes down. Life finds a way to adapt. http://upi.com/NewsTrack/view.php?StoryID=20051110-083624-9769r http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/01/04/060104185028.juffd4y7.html Global warming advocates have an easily defendable position. If its hot. Global Warming. If its cold. Global Warming. Windy? Wet? Dry? Yep. Global Warming.
I think we covered this in another thread, there are pollutants that consist of actually particles of crap, and their are polutants that consist of gases. Why do conservative people tend to be so bad at science? In another thread loren you admitted you had no clue what you were talking about, and yet you post the same thing here. Because the idea of global warming is very scary to some businesses, such as energy companies, and car manafacturers Those business interests fund studies and lobby the polititicans in power (which right now, are republicans) to push the the idea that gloabl warming doesn't exist. People like loren, and mia, being blind followers , immediately oppose anything that someone slaps a "liberal" label on. Which is somewhat funny because neither of you own energy companies (Maybe you own stock in energy companies, which would explain your position better), but since you both breath air, and have children, you essentially argueing a postion that goes against you are childrens future breathing interests.
Actually, you are trying to turn your question from that previous thread into a fact now. Quote from a previous thread (your post) I am willing to admit I don't get it all, but you are willing to accept "Facts" that you do not understand either. Who is a follower here? I have questions to ask, you seem to simply state "yep, must be" I also do not remember typing the word "liberal" in my post at all. I could be mistaken. But thanks for pointing out things that I "do" for me.
Do you even understand how global warming is supposedly works? Do you understand that it has to do with the wavelengths of light, and how they pass thru greenhouse GASES? The NYtimes article says An aerosol emmission is tiny solid particles, not a gas http://www.google.com/search?num=10...a:en-US:official&q=define:aerosol&btnG=Search Loren were you the same one who said they never found any neanderthal remains? No problem, thats what I am here for.
About as much as you understand how to properly structure a sentence Christ, quoting the NYT again? It must be the God's honest truth then. This thread is dead.... I took my Harley out today and made sure to run through a few lawns and kill a few plants on my way to work. Killing plants, driving a more fuel efficient vehicle, hell, I am gonna get the earth day dude of the day star.
It's not "science" that we are bad at; it's "Science Fiction". You guys on the left have cornered the market on that. I admit it, I am not very good at making things up.
Ferret, how do you explain the 20 year long ice age that happenned JUST 500 years ago? HUH? Were the vikings polluting with their hummers? Do some research, turn on the discovery channel instead of cartoon network.
Ferret needs to do his part in the fight against global warming and not use any fuel for just recreation - sell the boat, get a toyota car, since you don't need a v8 just to move 2 people. I am all for cutting pollutants, but the global warming thing is like a dog chasing his tail while having bad gas. It goes no where and just smells aweful.
It was a laren's article, that said something to effect that reducing aresol emmissions would increase the amount of sunlight hitting the earths surface, and in turn increase warming You got me , I was never much in english class, but did used to do pretty good in math and science um, what?
What a joke, I haven't heard anyone say there is no such thing as Global warming, ever except here. This is just a dirty camera lens http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/images/mexico city pollution.jpg
Very funny, you picked a city in a country that would not fall under any agreed international regulation, because it's considered a 'developing country'. Even after passages of any laws, they are immune.
Why stop the global warming. It will save our world from strong and powerful governments. Join my Globalwarming-fanclub instead
Go global warming go, I want to trade in my igloo for a real house. We should really be fighting global farting