What do you mean ? Do you mean , that results of election should be fake after counting , even in US ? I heard that after Bush second election, the results were fake, but that talks didnt continue much
There were significant "inconsistencies" in the exit polls for both the 2000 and 2004 elections. Russia had similar inconsistencies in their elections which resulted in Bush calling Putin and demanding that they cleared it up. Funny he didn't have the same conviction about being fair and accurate for elections here in the US. They say that a picture's worth a thousand words. Here's two videos that say it all. 2000 Election 2004 Election
Yeah, I agree. 100 more years...100 more years...YEAH... He's going to continue the fantastic job that W. Bush is doing. American voted TWICE for the dude, so no doubt they'll go for what they like and voted for: WAR. And don't forget oil: BUSH IN - $1.46/gallon | BUSH out - $4.00/gallon MCCAIN IN - $4.00/gallon | MCCAIN OUT - $25/gallon YOUPPEEEEE!!!! This is what we need for this country: a good republican building a 50 feet tall wall on the full mexican border AND the Canadian border, so no more terrorist swimming in the Rio Grande and stealing hamburgers from little fat Amrican leaving their Mc Donalds... And yes, we are currently winning the war and we will still be winning it in 20 years, 50 years and 100 years as promised by McCain... Isn't it a great post or what?
Those are the words of Joseph Stalin. I really wish we'd go back to handcounting, just for the sake of keeping things in check.
Both Obama and McCain presidencies bode bad things for America. McCain is likely to start another war with Iran to further the neoconservatives plans for the middle east and Obama is just going to take a heavy hand to domestic issues with help from a Democratic Congress. The way I see it though, the damage McCain is likely to wreak will be more immediate, severe and irreversible.
"Yet Obama has voted for all of the president's war funding requests since coming to the Senate," Apparently he was against it before he was for it before he was against it. http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/03/22/obama_defends_votes_in_favor_of_iraq_funding/ While John McCain's League of Democracies might sound insane, so does Obama's "regional democracy hubs" http://www.cfr.org/bios/11603/barack_obama.html The only real difference I see in the foreign policy is that Obama is more interested in Africa than the Middle East. Since China is treating much of Africa as its uncontested domain, I'm afraid that Obama's plans might lead to a larger confrontation.
Well, the difference is, China is pursuing a capitalist/mercantilist approach to Africa, and we would be more likely to pursue a mercantilist/militarist approach. Obama is not a free market trader.