stOx does not understand the purpose of getting the colt. stOx does not even know the life of Jesus. What Jesus needed the colt for? Jesus did that so he can do the will of God. As a matter of fact Jesus often was giving some of his own clothes to the poor. So getting material riches for Jesus was a waste of time and efforts and something that he didn’t come on Earth for. Studying the life of Jesus and to belief that Jesus just ordered his disciple to steal the colt makes no sense and is plain wrong. Jesus knew very well the will of God and did it perfectly. If somebody with God’s authority comes to you and tells you give me your car wouldn’t you give it?
It doesn't matter what the purpose was, He ordered his disciples to steal it, Fact, Jesus was a common criminal. No. I'd punch him in the face and call the police. You think i'm going to hand over a 5 grand car to some nut case who hears voices in his head?
Well yeah, Mohammed is greater among the two because he can be remembered for generations for two events: One is he oversaw the beheading of 600-odd Jews in a single day and seeing their wives/women getting raped too. Second is, universal - do-I-need-to-say-it thing, he fucked a nine-year old.
we all believe in life after death . God have created us . so it is easy to re-creat . (comparing to creating) we will all be judged . ( our acts , words....and all what we did in our life. )
It depends , for muslims , Mohammed is savior , for Christians , Jesus is savior , for free-thinker , god is savior
Evident lack of knowledge. What about the intercourse with 3 year olds as described in the bible. http://www.answering-christianity.com/age3.htm Don't get me started on your religion.(Judaism it is right ?) It will be far offensive than your posts
that's about your limit isn't it. I guess in your mind this is a well though out response to an argument based on evidence and logic. What jury would convict me for punching a guy who says the voices in his head told him to take my car? You don't get it do you. The religious are mentally ill in every respect of the word. They believe in invisible friends, They talk to themselves and they hear voices in their head. Imagine doing everything you do to god but instead to magical unicorns. You don't believe in unicorns, Do you?
Your response is not worth effort to discuss. I am getting quite bored with you repeating yourself over and over again. Sorry In Australia, if a guy asked to take my car and I punched him in the face as a response, I would go to jail for assault. Point blank, and rightly so. A simple "No" would have been the correct response. Violence has no reward in this matter. Col
If you didn't continuously make the same incorrect statments i may not have to repeat my corrections and own you so often. The guy talks to an invisible man in the sky and hears voices telling him to steal cars. You think this is a rational man who will respond to a reasonable request?
According to you. When are you going to bring in actual evidence from your slanderous accusations about me? Let me guess.....Never! It's got to do with "Law". This is what the problem is with man today. Man takes the "Law" into his own hands. Then cries out "HELP" when he is thrown in jail or taken down by others. The "Law" in Australia does not permit anyone to assualt anyone else no matter what the reason is. Col
LOL! No sir, I wouldn't loan my car to "god" or any representative thereof. Unless of course he performed a miracle or two first, just to make a believer out of me Sanity! No, not everyone believes in life after death. The rest is just delusional. I look forward to that! I have to agree here: a firm "no" would be my first step. A strong jab wouldn't be far behind if the "no" didn't have the intended effect though.
The nonbelievers do nothing but provide you with evidence. In this thread alone i have proven, By quoting the bible, That jesus was a criminal who is guilty of conspiracy to commit theft. It's perfectly legal to hit someone in self defence. Do you actually have any knowledge of anything or does your life consist of making up random statements and claiming that they are true?
Showing your true colours again st0x. You make statements about someone (that being me) and can't back it up. Someone asking you a question is no reason to punch them in self defence. Col
I don't see what relation this statement has to the part of text you quoted. And please, Don't play the victim, It will only make me attack your ideas with logic and evidence even more ferociously. You said "The "Law" in Australia does not permit anyone to assualt [sic] anyone else no matter what the reason is". Are you going to retract that now you have found it to be incorrect?
st0x. You are the one slandering me. How can I not be the victim here? Attack all you like. Does not change the truth of these matters. Did you or did you now make slanderous claims about me and the organisation I am in? It's quite a simple question. You know what I meant st0x. You are twisting things. Col
Like i said before, It's only slander if it is untrue. So go cry yourself to sleep and visit your "organisation" in the morning for comfort, Don't forget to take your wallet. This victim act really is pittiful. How can i be twisting things if i quoted word for word, Including misspellings, What you said? If that isn't what you meant then retract it. Expecting people to some how display psychic abilities to find out what you "meant" simply isn't good enough. We only have the words you write to go on, So please, Try to write the correct words which accurately express what it is you are trying to convey.