1. Advertising
    y u no do it?

    Advertising (learn more)

    Advertise virtually anything here, with CPM banner ads, CPM email ads and CPC contextual links. You can target relevant areas of the site and show ads based on geographical location of the user if you wish.

    Starts at just $1 per CPM or $0.10 per CPC.

Jagger 3 - happening now on some DC's?

Discussion in 'Google' started by dkalweit, Oct 31, 2005.

0
Page 1 of 7
  1. #1
    I'm seeing what looks like it might be jagger 3 on 66.102.9.104. I've been loyally following the position of one keyword that fell from #3 to #6 in Jagger1, and is now at #1 on this DC(which it held about 8 months ago-- far before Jagger). Others in Matt Cutt's blog comments are reporting seeing some changes, as well. I'm seeing very small movements for terms other than the one above-- maybe they're still being updated. Anyone else?


    --
    Derek
     
    dkalweit, Oct 31, 2005 IP
    just-4-teens likes this.
  2. explorer

    explorer Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    463
    Likes Received:
    40
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    110
    #2
    Yes, I've been monitoring this data center for over 12 hours now. I don't know whether it is Jagger 3 or if it's simply major continuing flux from Jagger 2. Certainly the changes taking place there and on 66.102.9.99 are the biggest I've seen in the last couple of weeks. On the face of it, it looks good for me, but there are many people on other forums who are unhappy with the changes taking place.
     
    explorer, Oct 31, 2005 IP
  3. sGroup

    sGroup Peon

    Messages:
    261
    Likes Received:
    16
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    wow - if this is J3 we really have a problem. Very very bad results.
     
    sGroup, Oct 31, 2005 IP
  4. getsum80

    getsum80 Peon

    Messages:
    342
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    I couldnt be any happier with this DC's results

    With #2,#3 for my main keyword HUHOY!!!!!!!!!!


    uh I hope it sticks though
     
    getsum80, Oct 31, 2005 IP
  5. fryman

    fryman Kiss my rep

    Messages:
    9,604
    Likes Received:
    777
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    370
    #5
    #2 for main keyword, #2 AND #3 for second keyword :eek:

    Crossing all my fingers...
     
    fryman, Oct 31, 2005 IP
  6. mattmdesign

    mattmdesign Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,201
    Likes Received:
    77
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    118
    #6
    Hmm... a few sites of mine have gone to #1, some back to first page, but a bunch still non existant (that used to rank well before the 1st jagger)... If this is how it stays then hopefully those new #1's will get enough traffic to make up for the others, but I doubt it :(
     
    mattmdesign, Oct 31, 2005 IP
  7. mdvaldosta

    mdvaldosta Peon

    Messages:
    4,079
    Likes Received:
    362
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    I've noticed I now rank for 1 of the keywords Im tracking, but not promoting. This is promising because I've been in the sandbox.
     
    mdvaldosta, Oct 31, 2005 IP
  8. mcdar

    mcdar Peon

    Messages:
    1,831
    Likes Received:
    110
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    On these Datacenters 66.102.11.* & 66.102.9.* I jumped from #508 this morning to #102 now.

    All the rest of the Datacenters the page was in the 20s.

    My pre-Jagger position was #12

    Caryl
     
    mcdar, Oct 31, 2005 IP
    Feizar likes this.
  9. mnemtsas

    mnemtsas Super Dud

    Messages:
    497
    Likes Received:
    40
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    Those results are weird. I've got two pages (formerly both no1 for their term). Like this:

    http://www.mysite.com/keyword-one.htm
    http://www.mysite.com/keyword-two.htm

    Neither ranks in the top 500 for the terms they are targetting. However, and this is the really dumb bit. The keyword-one.htm document is ranking in the mid 60's for keyword-two. And keyword-two.htm document is ranking in the mid 80's for the keyword-one. The only reason I can think that this is the case is that the pages link to each other. So the keyword-one text on the keyword-two page is enough to rank the page for keyword-one. Bizarre in the extreme. And yet the pages which are quite well structured and informative are not able to rank at all for the terms they are targetting.
     
    mnemtsas, Oct 31, 2005 IP
  10. longcall911

    longcall911 Peon

    Messages:
    1,672
    Likes Received:
    87
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #10
    Rather mixed results for me on the DCs with the new SERPs. One of my sites has returned to its former rank of #5. But another which was #7 has now disappeared from the top 100.

    What bothers me most is that G is all over the place for weeks. I can not believe that they are unable to change the algo on a 'test' database, get it straightened out and then update the real database over a couple of days.

    It almost seems as they they need to measure click throughs on changed SERPs to determine which sites are most (and least) effected. In my business, I couldn't roll out 3 different versions of our software in as many weeks and then decide which one we'll stick with. My customers would leave immediately.

    /*tom*/
     
    longcall911, Oct 31, 2005 IP
  11. emil2k

    emil2k Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,391
    Likes Received:
    80
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    138
    #11
    On that DC it shows that I went up again from number 3 to number 1....

    This is sweet...Google loves me :) ... But Google is one filthy whore :mad:
    So I will work on building a clientel rather then focus on SE rankings...Don't ever want to live at the barrel of the gun...
     
    emil2k, Oct 31, 2005 IP
    Arnie likes this.
  12. Roze

    Roze Guest

    Messages:
    403
    Likes Received:
    29
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #12
    please please please let those be the results that finally propagate. That's all I have to say about that!
     
    Roze, Oct 31, 2005 IP
  13. baseballcube

    baseballcube Peon

    Messages:
    107
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #13
    nothing good for me...

    Please let the results not be the final results.
     
    baseballcube, Oct 31, 2005 IP
  14. Lucky Bastard

    Lucky Bastard Peon

    Messages:
    406
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #14
    Half good, half not so good :)
     
    Lucky Bastard, Oct 31, 2005 IP
  15. tweetylover8402

    tweetylover8402 Peon

    Messages:
    730
    Likes Received:
    45
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #15
    What's amazing is that most of the internet users in the world have no idea this is going on.
     
    tweetylover8402, Oct 31, 2005 IP
  16. Roze

    Roze Guest

    Messages:
    403
    Likes Received:
    29
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #16
    Agreed, it's bizarre when you think about it. I just explained it to my mother over an instant message (it's cool to have a computer-hip mom, by the way) and she was truly amazed by the process. She understands why it's important though, when I'm away from the computer for a few days she activates my keyword tracker for me so I have historical data. :grin:
     
    Roze, Oct 31, 2005 IP
  17. sGroup

    sGroup Peon

    Messages:
    261
    Likes Received:
    16
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #17
    I have been looking at many different product searches and none of them seem to be very good, too many non shopping sites for product searches.
     
    sGroup, Oct 31, 2005 IP
  18. flyguy

    flyguy Peon

    Messages:
    198
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #18
    In addition to the 66.102.11.x 66.102.9.x
    I'm seeing what appears to be jagger 3 on the following.
    216.239.59.99
    216.239.59.104
     
    flyguy, Oct 31, 2005 IP
  19. Roze

    Roze Guest

    Messages:
    403
    Likes Received:
    29
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #19
    and 216.239.53.104
    and 216.239.57.104
    and 216.239.59.105

    Looks like the 216.239's are going in that direction also.
     
    Roze, Oct 31, 2005 IP
  20. jward

    jward Active Member

    Messages:
    452
    Likes Received:
    23
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #20
    That is my conspiracy theory as well. :)
     
    jward, Oct 31, 2005 IP
Page 1 of 7